Profits Over People: A History of Big Pharma/Chemical/Agriculture Cover Ups

작년

vax life.jpe

We have all seen the memes mocking those who question the safety of pharmaceutical products as crazy & "anti-science"

Can we really afford to trust Big Pharma & our regulatory agencies that much?

Do they have a history of putting profits over the lives of the public?

image.png

This issue is especially prevalent right now given the recent launch of the documentary

"Vaxxed II"

Which mainly focuses on the testimony of parents of children that have been permanently disabled immediately following injections.

They've been ridiculed and laughed at, why?

Well obviously because there's NO WAY Big Pharma, the CDC, and EPA could be lying about the risks associated with their products, right?

Interesting question:

Has our media, regulatory agencies & pharma ever colluded to cover up the deaths of thousands in the name of profit??

Well, the answer to that is yes.

Many, many, MANY times over YES.

In this article, we'll be covering the

  • Vioxx scandal

  • Opioid Crisis

  • Glyphosate Cancer coverup

  • Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

  • Pluserix/Trivirix MMR vaccine tragedy

  • CDC Whistleblowers

And much more.

Won't start with Vaccines because most are too far indoctrinated with the billions of dollars of propaganda produced on the subject

Let's start with a simple premise

If Big Pharma spent millions creating & advertising a drug that turned out to be dangerous, would they tell you?

![image.png]

In 1999, Pharmaceutical giant Merck releases a new painkiller product

"Vioxx"

And regardless of the fact that their initial study shows double the risk for heart problem-related death, they refuse to pull the drug from shelves for

5 FUCKING YEARS

The results are catastrophic

image.png

image.png

Despite many calls for further cardiovascular studies, Merck refuses.

It's estimated that over 20 MILLION Americans took Viox.

88,000 suffered heart attacks.

38,000 DIED

The typical Vioxx user was elderly, so it is unknown how many really died. Some estimates reach 500,000.

image.png

How could this happen in America?

How could the FDA approve this drug and leave it on the market??

How come the media didn't warn us about this and save thousands of innocent lives?

Perhaps it has to do with the fact that Pharma spends more money advertising than on R&D

image.png

This means that it is absolutely NOT in the interest of our extremely centralized 6 media companies' interest to cover anything that would threaten Pharma's bottom line.

Much like how they promote endless war for the military-industrial complex & ignore Elite pedos like Epstein.

image.png

image.png

How else did Merck manage to keep collecting their blood money for 5 years uninterrupted?

Well, mainly by creating a blacklist of any doctor that was speaking out against the risks (sound familiar?)

If you were a doctor, would you ruin your career to be a hero?

I doubt it.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJH_N4rWkAA-KOs?format=png&name=360x360

image.png

image.png

"But Mr. Tang! Surely our government can still be trusted to protect us, this must be a fluke! Our system is based on incorruptible SCIENCE"

Well thats where youre wrong Mr. Strawman

To explore how the Big Pharma/Gov relationship REALLY works, lets check out the Opioid Crisis

image.png

image.png

While the media runs 24/7 stories about Measles (which has killed 1 person in the US in the last 15 years), over 47,000 US people died from Opioids in 2017 alone.

Big Pharma is currently being sued in courts around the country for it

How did they get away with it for so long?

image.png

image.png

While the answer is multi-faceted, I think it's best to start with the fact that Big Pharma spends more money lobbying congress than ANY OTHER INDUSTRY

Over $2.5 Billion over the last decade.

A great way to make sure no one in government says anything that might piss you off

image.png

image.png

HmM well, this leads us to the last leg of this criminal, colluding, blood money-sucking structure

The FDA

Surely we can trust them to provide tough/unbiased oversight of our food & drug corporations, right?

It's not like they're both run by literally the same people, RIGHT??

image.png

image.png

This concept of there being a "Revolving door" between regulatory agencies and the corporations they supposedly "regulate" is nothing new.

Essentially, while working for the FDA, the food and drug companies bid on the employees and offer them lucrative jobs after their tenure

image.png

This, of course, incentivizes the men and women of the FDA to make sure to keep big pharma and big agriculture happy, as to not jeopardize their cushy future jobs.

One of the most obvious examples of this has to do with Monsanto and their Glyphosate-based "Roundup" Pesticide

image.png

For years, international health organizations warned that the extremely harsh pesticide made by Monsanto "Round-Up" had serious health effects

The company and the FDA continued to insist nothing was wrong until in 2018 a landmark court case ruled in favor of a California man

image.png

Round-Up was found to be cancerous

Meanwhile, traces of its active agent Glyphosate can be found everywhere from baby food to Cheerios

Why were they allowed to operate for so long undisturbed?

Might have something to do with Obama appointing Monsanto's Ex-VP as head of the FDA

image.png

image.png

image.png

So let's recap:

  • Big Pharma: Loves blood money, will smear doctors trying to blow whistle

  • Congress: took $2.5B from Pharma this decade

  • FDA: run by future/ex-employees of those corporations they regulate

  • The US Public: life span dropping, more sickly than ever before.

So now that we've established the players and how the game works, we can clearly see

"scientific evidence"

and

"safety"

Are at the absolute bottom of this disgustingly corrupt cabals list of objectives.

Profit is king, and they will do anything to keep the charade going.

And now, what we've ALL been waiting for, the ultimate in taboo:

The infallible, the 1000% safe & necessary, the soon to be completely mandatory by threat of imprisonment and ex-communication from civilization itself:

Vaccines.

Brace yourselves normies, this is gonna be rough.

Here's what Im NOT saying:

  • all vaccines are dangerous/useless

Heres what I AM saying:

  • there are well documented cases of horrific damage caused by various vaccines that have been criminally covered up

We need to be honest about risks & raise the standards in the industry

Alright, so lets start by covering some basics about the industry that might surprise you:

Say a vaccine DOES happen to be harmful and causes significant damage to a child?

Is Pharma company even liable? Can they be sued as they have been for other malpractice?

Since 1988, NO

image.png

Secondly, people seem to be under the impression that there is 0 risk whatsoever associated with vaccination:

Also completely false.

In fact, there's an entire government fund set up to compensate the victims of said damage that has paid out over $4 BILLION dollars

image.png

This, of course, does not even BEGIN to describe the total possible victims of malpractice in this area.

It is especially difficult to prove direct developmental vaccine damage in court as the CDC's vaccination schedule calls for many vaccines before a child can talk.

Now, possibly the most alarming standard in the vaccine industry is the fact that the standard "double-blind placebo" testing is not required.

This means the gold standard of scientific medical testing is thrown to the wind.

This is allowed as the CDC labels vaccines biologics

What other evidence can we find that profit incentives may have encouraged an increasing risk tolerance/negligence?

Well for one, after the no liability law was passed, the number of CDC recommended vaccines EXPLODED

From 24 doses in 1983 to 72 today

image.png

The question still remains:

Has there ever been a case of a dangerous vaccine being released? And how did the Pharmaceutical industry and their bought and paid for government officials handle it?

Yes.

And horrifically. With absolutely 0 regard for the safety of children.

image.png

Let's go back to 1986, the exact same time the vaccine liability exception was being passed in the US.

Glaxo company Smith Kline releases their

"Pluserix"

MMR vaccine in Canada. In 1988 it was pulled from use as it was found to be extremely dangerous

So what happened next?

It was permanently shelved and the company punished right?

NOPE

It was promptly renamed

"Trivirix"

And was released 2 years later in Britain where it caused THE EXACT SAME HORRIFIC DAMAGE TO THE CHILDREN INJECTED

Trivirix would continue to be sold and injected into young children in Britain until 1992

But surely, the British government couldn't have known about these adverse side effects right??

Actually, thanks to a freedom of information act request, we now know for sure that THEY DID

image.png

But that's just Britain, right?

Not like the US would ever participate in something so gruesome...

Let's explore the history of the CDC and one of their most infamous projects:

The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

image.png

Over the course of 40 years, the CDC allowed hundreds of Alabama black men, women and children to be infected with syphilis and refused to offer them treatment

This program was only stopped in 1972 because of a whistleblower and the following congressional investigation

image.png

Believe it or not, no significant changes to the CDCs code of ethics were made after this scandal.

Let's fast forward to another, more relevant and recent CDC study, with yet ANOTHER whistleblower

Unfortunately, THIS 2014 whistleblower has been largely ignored & smeared

image.png

In 2004 the CDC conducted a study on Merck's (remember them?) MMR vaccine

While the team claimed no link to autism, in 2014, Dr. William S. Thompson a senior epidemiologist at the CDC who co-authored the study came forward claiming they hid important information

Luckily he saved all the documentation that the team destroyed.

Below is a 2004 letter sent by Dr. Thompson to the then CDC director Dr. Julie Gerberding about the team hiding evidence

In 2014, Dr. Gerberding had already been hired by Merck as their EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

image.png

Once agaim we see how the revolving door operates.

The CDC conducts favorable studies, the director is rewarded with a cushy job later

To this day, Dr. Thompson's information and testimony has been largely ignored amd his reputation destroyed

This shit is extremely painful to write about so I'm gonna wrap it up here.

In conclusion, I believe we need to be more skepital about EVERYTHING the CDC/FDA/Big Pharma tells us as they have proven time and time again to be untrustworthy

We need to raise our standards

As tempting as it is to go along with the memes and ridicule the mothers of permanently damaged children, we need to listen to them and take them seriously.

We need to carefully scrutinize every part of the vaccination process and see if theres anyway we can reduce damage risk.

We need to push for laws banning the revolving door between corporations and the regulatory agencies

We need more independent media not beholden to pharma advertising money

We need to stop electing politicians that accept huge Pharma donations

We need to take our power back.

Peace, Love, Anarchy,

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

I will copy some things from Reddit threads I have bookmarked about this topic.


source

Vaccines have been the driving factor in increasing life by about 80% vs. when we did not have them:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151714/

The cons are negligible compared to the pros.

Should we talk about the potential harm done by seatbelts when telling people whether to use them or not? Or should we recognize they are overwhelmingly positive and encourage people to wear them?


source

Antivaxxers do not only harm themselves. I realize that many people have brought up “at risk populations” that are unable to get the vaccine for medical reasons, but that’s not the only reason.

More unvaccinated carriers and afflicted result in a greater likelihood that the disease mutates into a version that resists the initial vaccine. The immune system creates antibodies to specific sites on “invaders” called epitopes, if the sequence encoding those epitopes change, antibody bonding will be disrupted.

Vaccine immunity isn’t 100% even in healthy individuals. Immunity wanes with time and scheduling is based on the average person. Some individuals lose the immune memory more rapidly and would need incredibly expensive tests to know if this is the case (as a preventative measure) or be proactive enough to frequently get blood tests for specific vaccine antibodies to demonstrate maintained immunity. This group is also at risk.


source


source

Data on vaccine efficacy and safety is among the most transparent in medicine specifically because the medical community desperately wants to convince people like you who are skeptical but genuinely want to learn more.

Here is the CDC website on vaccine safety. There is detailed information on the risks of specific vaccines, links to safety, etc. You may not trust them, but one important thing to note is that they don’t deny that there are risks. There is a lot of discussion of side effects, most of which are minor but can be really scary, like seizures. But they do point out other risks. For example, the MMR vaccine:

Extremely rarely, a person may have a serious allergic reaction to MMR vaccine. Anyone who has ever had a life-threatening allergic reaction to the antibiotic neomycin, or any other component of MMR vaccine, should not get the vaccine.

The medical community also doesn’t hide when a vaccine is so dangerous that it’s not worth the risk. RotaShield was approved as a vaccine against rotavirus in the ‘90s. Some infants started developing intussusception, a type of bowel obstruction, soon after getting the vaccine. After some investigations, the vaccine was withdrawn. The whole story is here

So let’s walk through that—a vaccine is released. Data emerges that there is a risk it is harming some babies. The risk was still really rare—1 or 2 additional cases for every 10,000 babies vaccinated. It was so rare that you statistically couldn’t identify it in a trial of 10,000 patients. The condition itself was treatable in almost all cases. The vaccine was withdrawn anyway.

What that translates to—the vaccine can kill people. It probably has killed people. But it is so rare that the risk is worth the benefits, especially since we can take steps to identify and mitigate the risks.

Let’s talk about efficacy. Here too you can find honest info about how effective we know vaccines to be. Take the flu vaccine—it’s incredibly variable each year how well it will work. The medical community encourages everyone to take it anyway but they don’t hide the fact that it sometimes doesn’t work that well. Here is a chart of effectiveness over the last decade of so. The vaccine makers flat out miss in some years—10% effectiveness in 2004 is terrible. But they don’t hide those facts.

So let’s look at the most common vaccines. Sure, they might cause previously unidentifiable serous harm in some cases. I can’t rule it out. But it is so rare that literally no one can make a compelling data-driven case that the problem exists, weighted against the well-proven benefits of protecting against some truly terrible diseases. If you want to claim that contrary studies are being hidden, I’ll need to see some evidence of that, and why those are hidden when lots of other “bad” news is easy to find on the CDC’s on websites.

Let’s also talk about profit motives. Vaccines are not that profitable. Maybe some of the newest ones, but generally they aren’t a huge money maker, especially not for the vast majority of doctors administering them. The standard vaccines for the American market were so unprofitable that the big concern 10’years ago was that drug companies were abandoning the market.

You know what makes a lot more money than preventing disease? Treating disease. What profit motive is there in pushing one shot for polio against a lifetime of selling expensive treatment for a paraplegic polio patient? An MMR shot is not nearly as profitable as a hospital stay for measles complications. If anything, vaccines reduce the profits of drug companies because there are fewer sick people to sell drugs to.

On a more emotional level, parenting is fucking scary. Every decision you make is simply weighing risks and benefits and hoping that you’re making the best bets possible. It is hard to watch doctors put a needle in your kid while they scream. The side effects can make you question your judgement—my youngest basically got mild measles symptoms from his MMR and was miserable for almost a week. But all the data and evidence we have available says that vaccines are worth it.


source

There is tremendous amounts of research on the risks of vaccines. The public health community is incredibly transparent about documenting those risks and making the underlying studies available.

If you click through that website, all the data is there. The WHO also has a good page here.

Take the MMR, for example. Here is the more detailed safety data on the vaccine. At the extreme, they acknowledge there is a risk of a complication involving brain swelling, because there have been three known cases, only one of which is linked with confidence to the vaccine and which happened in people who were otherwise immunocompromised. For a vaccine that has been given millions of times, three documented cases is functionally the same as zero risk.

They also identify other potential side effects—up to 1 in 40,000 children might develop an issue with blood clotting, which isn’t life threatening and is treatable with a transfusion.

Fevers are the most common side effect—both my kids get them after vaccines—and in some cases the fever is bad enough to cause seizures. Still rare, in the 1 in a few thousand range, but common enough that you may meet someone who had it happen.

In case you’re worried that doctors dismiss these side effects, the medical community has shown they will pull vaccines when problems emerge. For example, RotaShield was approved as a vaccine against rotavirus in the ‘90s. Some infants started developing intussusception, a type of bowel obstruction, soon after getting the vaccine. After some investigations, the vaccine was withdrawn. The whole story is here.

So let’s walk through that—a vaccine is released. Data emerges that there is a risk it is harming some babies. The risk was still really rare—1 or 2 additional cases for every 10,000 babies vaccinated. It was so rare that you statistically couldn’t identify it in a trial of 10,000 patients. The condition itself was treatable in almost all cases. The vaccine was withdrawn anyway.

The common theme is that the likely side effects are known, researched and, in almost all cases, not serious. When they are, the vaccine is pulled. Febrile seizures are scary as a parent, but your kid will be fine. “Proven safe” means “incredibly unlikely to cause permanent harm,” not “absolutely free from side effects.”

The most serious problems are associated with people who are allergic to the vaccines or people who are immunocompromised. These people should not get vaccines. Doctors know that and will tell patients (or their parents) in those situations not to get vaccinated.

The fact that some people can’t get vaccinated because their doctors have advised against it is why it’s so important the rest of us get vaccinated, even if it means your kid might get a fever or even have a scary seizure. It’s not just a question of deciding you don’t care if your kid gets measles. Those people depend on herd immunity to stay healthy, and parents who choose not to vaccinate their kids even though their kids would almost certainly be fine are choosing to put those other people at more risk.

·

The cons are negligible compared to the pros.

Unless its your child's who has just had their world changed dramatically, forever.

·
·

Read the next comment. That might help you understand that quote you cited.

·
·
·

Read my comment under your quote and imagine you have just seen your child transform after being vaccinated.

Then have a look at the growth curves of vaccinations and Autism.
Also have a look at the ingredients they use.

I get that people want to believe that authority is always working for the public well being. But sadly they are working for their own profit and advancement.

Very sensitive subject for me.

·
·
·
·

The only evidence of vaccines causing autism was dubious at best, given by a man called Andrew Wakefield in 1998. Many researchers have tried to reproduce his findings and failed. Based on the world's scientific structure, it has been disproven.

Let's examine the facts

Let's say for the argument's sake that it's a plot and allllll studies ever that have failed have been paid off to fail. All? How come no one has ever been able to reproduce it in 22 years since the study came up?

Furthermore, plenty of studies lead the scientific community to believe that autism develops in the womb and, since it only shows parent-noticeable signs after the age when children get their first vaccinations, there is a tendency to misplace the cause on the vaccines.

The avoidable injury

Now, let's talk about the many, many diseases that are avoided by vaccines. Did you know that there is a minimal likelihood to survive once you've been infected with rabies, for example, and that it's entirely avoidable with vaccination?

Once a rabies infection is established, there's no effective treatment. Though a small number of people have survived rabies, the disease usually causes death. For that reason, if you think you've been exposed to rabies, you must get a series of shots to prevent the infection from taking hold. (source)

Countless other diseases could bring death to a child. Diphtheria had disappeared 30 years ago, for example. It has a death rate of 10% of infected people. A significant percentage of people have stopped vaccinating their children recently and last year it reappeared and claimed its first victim in 30 years.

The relationship between autism and vaccines has not been reproducible at all by any for-or-non-for-profit scientific organization in the whole world. How is it feasible then to endanger not only your children but other people's children to hundreds of preventable diseases with high death rates, only because one (disproven) scientist said that vaccines might cause autism sometimes in 1998?

It's likely a doctor would've spoken out

Let's imagine again, that all of the above is irrelevant. For argument's sake, let's imagine that vaccines do cause terrible consequences and come with loads of autism and other things:

Being a doctor is one of the noblest professions in the whole world. While many outliers are immoral, I think it's fair to say that if there is a measure of morality, the highest density of positive morality would be in hospitals. It would be in the hands of nurses and doctors, whose full dedication is to abide by the Hippocratic Oath, according to which they swear to use their abilities to help the sick and injured and never to cause harm knowingly.

Let's very much exaggerate and say that 80% of doctors are actually immoral and very evil. That hugely inflated number would leave at least 20% of doctors ranging from morally neutral to morally good, who would perceive these terrible consequences and loads of autism caused by vaccines. A small percentage of these doctors would notice this and speak out. But it hasn't happened. Only one doctor has ever spoken out about it, and his method has been found to be faulty and irreproducible.

Let's reexamine our views

Finally, let's return to normalcy and see that:

  • Given the irreproducibility of these experiments, there is a great likelihood that the relationship between vaccines and autism is either false or greatly exaggerated.
  • Let's also see that there are countless fatal and crippling diseases that can be easily avoidable through vaccines.
  • Let's observe the social responsibility that each parent has to their children and their neighbour's children's safety.
  • Let's see that it's unlikely that anything above a small percentage of doctors are actually immoral and that most doctors, given their profession, would want to speak out if they noticed such a dark relationship between vaccines and harmful consequences.
  • Let's also notice that deadly preventable diseases like measles and diphtheria have been on the rise ever since anti-vaxxing became a thing.

Does it still sound reasonable to say that vaccines cause autism, and therefore should be avoided?

·
·
·
·
·

Don't even try that double speak bullshit with me. It is way to close to home.

I am not sure if you actually believe what you are saying. I suspect that you know you are only spreading meaningless propaganda. You get no respect from me for that.

·
·
·
·
·
·
  1. What "double speak"?
  2. Why would I spread what I believe is meaningless propaganda? There's nothing in it for me to get you to buy vaccines.
  3. Need some arguments there, you're just attacking me personally without touching the validity of the information I shared.
·
  ·  작년

Truly clueless... I hope you are being paid to post all that crap off reddit, the alternative is scary.

image.png

·
·

What, you want an image battle? I can do that.

Thanks for your attention. I write in big letters as a reciprocal courtesy. :)

·

Well done. It takes guts to stand up to this kind of nonsense because they will go off on one and start attacking you

·
·

Indeed, I'm actually scared because of the enormous votes this post got. If any one of them started downvoting me my blog would be destroyed.

And unlike the other commenter suggested, there will be no monetary compensation available for my risk lol.

Thanks for your support. :)

·
·
·

No worries. Sometimes posts get big votes without the content actually being supported. And if it's conspiracies well, they do tend to go down well.

Are you deep state..? :0D

·
·
·
·

Are you deep state..? :0D

Well, I had too google the term so I guess that disqualifies me lol

Slice23.jpg

Great post! Good summary of the Big Pharma corruption. Adding to the vaccine fraud is that some don’t even have the antigens of the virus they claim to be ‘vaccinating’ against...

https://steemit.com/familyprotection/@jasonliberty/vaccinegate-when-they-don-t-even-bother-using-antigens-in-vaccines-any-longer

We need to stop electing politicians that accept huge Pharma donations

one step further, we need to stop electing politicians in general and do something more productive with our time than take part in the clown show👍

·

When good people stop voting, then only bad people vote, and that is how things get worse and worse.

·
·

can't convince a statist to opt for self responsibility rather than partaking in the collective clown show. 👍 😆😆 alas the tyranny rolls on and our individual rights are still slaughtered. Thanks for playing though 😉

·
·
·

I believe in self responsibility. That is the point.

·
·
·
·

not voting IS a vote 👍 of no confidence in the entire lie. There are thousands of actions people can do that are vastly more beneficial than voting for which corrupt clown, and they are all corrupt clowns every single one of them, should bring us solutions via the federal USA voting system.

an individuals involvement in the circus is not detrimental to preventing tyranny; it is quite the opposite in a variety of ways.

·
·
·
·
·

I agree to the extent that people try their best to spark revolutions for the long-run, the long-term, as it can take time. I believe in the 10th amendment which is all about reducing federal government. I would prefer no federal government at all. But it is a question of getting there gradually. Rome wasn't built in a day. So, it is all about encouraging the Trump Supporters into taking action. It seems that too many Trump Lovers are kind of worse than leftists in some ways to the extent they don't do things to help. They need to get involved and educate people and encourage people away from government.

·
·
·
·
·

I hate it when Trump says things and people cheer. I hear Trump say things and I say, "No." I would be arguing with Trump. I would be debating Trump. Too many people are just like yes men. They are idiots. They need to confront Trump on so many issues. That makes me angry. If I was at a Trump Rally, I would not cheer for everything, especially some of the very vague things. Because life is so complex.

  ·  작년

Just say it - "all vaccines are dangerous/useless" - it's 100% true and about time the sheeple woke up to that...

http://www.frot.co.nz/design/health/vaccination/

image.png

That is regrettable and the worst thing is that in great part when we act as masses we are different from our individual attitude and that is one of the causes of all this disaster...

Eso es lamentable y lo peor es que en gran parte cuando actuamos como masas somos distintos a nuestra actitud individual y esa es una de las causas de todo este desastre…

This should go viral. But it probably won’t.😔

Posted using Partiko iOS

Very interesting read! Thanks for sharing!

Heres my #POSH proof of sharing:

Sent out the link of this post to my 11,000 twitter followers:

https://twitter.com/DrutangAtHome/status/1232741516617175046?s=20

On this generation we have to think wise. We have to choose wise. Don't be easily decieve by the people who just speak all the promises.