Bitcoin Cash has the roadmap that lead to Bitcoin's original success Bitcoin Cash has the roadmap that will lead to Bitcoin's future success.
I cover this and a couple of other topics happening in the Bitcoin space recently including Censorship of my Youtube channel and the @Bitcoin Twitter account.
This is what he is talking about. It was already a censorship fight, 10 months ago.
This is actually overly generous to the r/Bitcoin side. The truth is they now rampantly edit, delete, and ban with absolutely no visible moderator record. r/Bitcoin might as well be a corporate sub locked to upvote-only.
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@lexiconical/bitcoin-scaling-s-western-front-of-propaganda-outsider-s-guide-to-the-bitcoin-subreddits
Relevant: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@lexiconical/seg-wit-is-a-trojan-horse-bitcoin-scaling-debate-explained
@rogerkver was good meeting you in Acapulco earlier this year brother.. I will be back again next year hope to talk some more. FYI I have delegated my SP for the next few weeks, sorry that you got flagged here. I wish I could give you some support. I have faith the Steem eco system will work these small issues out in time. Keep in mind, your post is still in the blockchain when flagged.
I recommend using Busy.org, where the posts don't get grayed out. At least it didn't in my feed.
Thanks for coming back to Steemit @rogerkver! No censorship here on the Steem Blockchain :)
Just a ton of bots and a stale trending page, depending on what interface site you use... but I guess that's not very unique for Steem ;)
Dear sir,I also support you about @rogerkver.
On Steemit.com some things get grayed out, yes, but not on the Steem blockchain and you can still view it even on Steemit if you don't prefer other apps.
This. Obviously this.
Post to Steem more often! I had totally forgotten you were on here. You should get on Dtube as well. Censorship is lame!
He only post now because he want to pump his shit coin. After this pump and dump event you won't see him here anymore until his next scam event. Beter he f*cks off here instead of only using the platform to scam people.
I'll try to be back more often.
Please do, so I can tear apart every single false claim you have.
You're running a full-on identity scam, and you know it.
Good teardown on the whole confidence scheme here - https://hackernoon.com/thats-not-bitcoin-that-s-bcash-f730f0d0a837
You say this about once or twice a year, then disappear again. If anyone believes you, they’re a damn fool.
You have a point there. I'm guessing it's a courtesy mostly and that like myself promising things here, he's been very busy with the whole BTC-BCH debacle.
Don't bother. I'm going to make sure all of your bitcoin crash posts are killed.
Only the highly insecure cannot stand competition.
Thanks for proving my point.
Hi Bernie, I know its been two years, what has changed since this?Screenshot_20180423-214157.png
Realizing he's a piece of shit. How's that?
I'm not gonna defend all of Rogers actions, but you realized that what... he has ideological views, uses his wealth for it, allows himself to get emotional and sometimes flips the finger at people when they troll him?
Funny how this reminds me of someone... ;)
As for Bitcoin Cash, you probably know better than to think it is merely a pump and dump or that it will die anytime soon. Let's get real. Toxicity in r/BTC or on Twitter, whoever it comes from, Rogers behaviour, some guy claiming to be Satoshi and never fulfilling his promise, changes very little about the fundamentals.
If you think Bitcoin Cash will be centralized, I guess in your book it might be. Also in my book, depending. But you can't deny that it will be an interesting experiment for many reasons (or if we consider Bitcoin SL chain/Lightning network the experiment). Far more interesting from a scientific perspective than say Litecoin or Dogecoin.
Finally we'll have something real to study, rather than bickering about how it should work in theory and never testing any of it out.
How is dogecoin not interesting?
Pointing out these people are fucking hypocrites does nothing, literally NOTHING, to slow them down.
They can operate saturated in cognitive dissonance.
Does the cognitive dissonance burn your brain, Bernie?
I'm with you Bruv! Glad to have @rogerkver back!
Satisfying enough, answers the question succinctly.
And here's the detailed proof - https://hackernoon.com/thats-not-bitcoin-that-s-bcash-f730f0d0a837
Great analysis and historical reference on the whole con-game that Very Wrong Ver is running.
Actual answer: Bernie has completely lost his mind. He is now a raging form of autistic. His opinions aren't based on logic and he only wants to watch the world burn.
He's a capricious, useless, pre-mining piece of shit.
I may be some of those things but there is no such thing as "pre-mining" on the Steem blockchain, so, carry on ignorant troll...
You're just one of those poor twats looking for an excuse for having such a sad wallet.
Bernie himself IS a troll. He could attack like 8 other ridiculous Bitcoin forks, but he attacks the one with a functional product.
Both him and Transisto go out of their way to censor and attack Bitcoin Cash. It must somehow interfere with their "Using Steem As Nothing More Than A Bitcoin Extraction Plan" operation they've run since day 1.
Watch out, these are organized, censoring FUD'ers. Demonstrable lies pointed out in this thread.
https://cryptocurrencyfacts.com/2017/12/05/upcoming-bitcoin-forks-2017-2018/
Inconvenient facts - https://hackernoon.com/thats-not-bitcoin-that-s-bcash-f730f0d0a837
With screenshotted references and detailed technicals.
Jesus, you're fucking ignorant...
I'm so glad all of your rewards come from bots and not actual users reading your trash.
The ONLY reason BCH is relevant is because they gave it to BTC holders for free. If they didn't, nobody would give two flying fucks.
Roger is just some half baked retard who got into BTC early, there's nothing else to him.
You're such a pussy little bitch.
"The ONLY reason BCH is relevant is because they gave it to BTC holders for free. If they didn't, nobody would give two flying fucks."
Hey Bernie, here's demonstrable proof you are talking bullshit.
Guess what, many of these forks gave away coins to BTC holders too. Funny how none of them are relevant?
BitcoinX (BCX): A smart contract (like Ethereum) based Bitcoin. Block 498888. //bcx.org/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; the coin has officially been released and trades on a number of exchanges.
ABitcoin (ABTC): A “light speed” Bitcoin with smart contracts. Block 498888. The ABTC fork was also a fork for Achain holders. //www.abitcoin.one/. NOTE: Snapshot block occurred, but the coin doesn’t seem to be trading. The ABTC fork was also a fork for Achain holders.
Bitcoin Hot (BTH): Lightning network, smart contract, zero-knowledge proof, anti quantum hash. Block 498848. NOTE: Snapshot block occurred, but the coin doesn’t seem to be trading.
Super Bitcoin (SBTC): Like BitcoinX, a smart contract based Bitcoin. Block 498888. //www.supersmartbitcoin.com/index.html. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; the coin has officially been released and trades on a number of exchanges.
Bitcoin Platinum (BTP): According to the site, “Satoshi’s original vision of Decentralized Electronic Cash.” Around December 12th. Blocks 497757 / 498533. //bitcoinplatinum.github.io/ko.html TIP: Bitcoin Platinum is rumored to be fake see: Bitcoin Platinum Created By South Korean Teenager As a Scam, Local Market Erupts. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of (in this case potentially because it wasn’t a real fork).
Bitcoin Oil (OBTC). No-premine, proof of stake, CPU mining, 2mb blocks. Block 498,888. //www.oilbtc.io/index_en.html NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin World (BTW). 8mb blocks, proof of work, replay protection. Block 499777. //btw.one/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin Stake (BTCS): Proof of stake (as the name implies). Block 499999. //btcscoin.com/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin Faith (BTF): Smart Contracts, 8mb blocks, and Lightening Network. Block 500000. //www.bitcoinfaith.org/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Lightning Bitcoin (LBTC): A fork that is meant to provide “lightning fast payments.” Uses smart contracts and can host decentralized apps like Ethereum (and Super Bitcoin). Around December 23rd. Block 499,999. //lightningbitcoin.io/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; I know of no futures trading. (Not to be confused with LiteBitcoin).
Bitcoin Cash Plus (BCP): According to the site, “fulfilling the original promise of Bitcoin.” Around January 2nd, 2018. Block 501407. //www.bitcoincashplus.org/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; I know of no futures trading.
Bitcoin Silver (BTCS): According to a BitcoinTalk forum, the coin aims to “Make Bitcoin Decentralized Again.” Apparently, it occurs “in December.” The site had issues at one point. When the site started working “again” it appeared to be a token sale (an Ethereum-based ICO). //bitcoinsilver.io/. NOTE: This ended up being an ICO; I don’t know if it is real, but it is not a Bitcoin fork.
Bitcoin Uranium (BUM): According to a BitcoinTalk forum, the coin aims to “Make Bitcoin Great Again.” Apparently, it occurs “in December.” //bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2316506. NOTE: No update on this fork; it is very doubtful that it “occurred in December.” There isn’t even an official site.
Bitcoin Top (BTT): Bitcoin Top is like Bitcoin Cash with Segwit and privacy protection according to the site. There isn’t much to go on here outside a website. Block 501118. //www.bitcointop.org/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin Pizza (BPA): A Bitcoin that uses Directed Acyclic Graph technology (DAG), the technology IOTA uses. Block 501,888. //p.top/.
Bitcoin File (BIFI): Smart contracts, content network, and bigger blocks. Block 501225. //www.bitcoinfile.org/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin God (GOD): No pre-mining, no central team (in theory), smart contracts, large blocks, POS mining, lightening network enabled, zero-knowledge proof, etc. It’s apparently a [slightly late] Christmas Present from Chinese Angel Investor Chandler Guo. Block 501225. Originally said to occur Dec. 25, but block 501225 won’t happen until sometime late Dec. 26 or early Dec. 27 PST. //www.bitcoingod.org/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; I know of no futures trading.
BitEthereum (BITE): A fork for both Ethereum and Bitcoin. According to the site: ETH block: 4766319. Each ETH can claim 0.34210519 BITE tokens. BTC block: 500283. Each BTC can claim 3.93946357 BITE tokens. //www.bitethereum.io.
Bitcoin Segwit2x “2.0”: The Bitcoin hard fork Segwit2x is rumored to be back again after being canceled at the last minute back in October (at the time it was meant to occur at block 494784, there was a rumor that it did occur, but no nodes are running it). From what we can tell, and as a reader pointed out, this iteration of Segwit2x seems to have no direct relation to the last Segwit2x fork beyond its name. Further, there is some who question the legitimacy of this fork. The current iteration is planned for block 501451. For the original fork, see: //segwit2x.github.io/. For the latest iteration, see //cointelegraph.com/news/hard-fork-take-two-segwit2x-will-return-dec-28-says-founder. Also see //medium.com/@nicolas.etienne368/fake-segwit2x-fork-by-jaap-turlouw-7d06e5703cba. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; Segwit2x futures have been trading since the last Segwit2x fork (be careful trading these futures though, if the forks are unrelated it isn’t clear how exchanges that are allowing Segwit2x futures trading will rectify this).
Bitcoin Smart (BCS): Equihash mining, 8mb blocks, Segwit, replay, smart contracts, no pre-mine. The smart nod is a nod to smart contracts. It is similar to Bitcoin God where it throws the kitchen sink into the mix. Block 505050. //bcs.info/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin Ore (BCO): Proof of capacity AKA proof of space, 8mb blocks, replay protection. Block 501,949. //www.bitcoinore.org/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin Interest (BCI): A proof of stake Bitcoin fork (it pays you interest for holding BCI essentially). January 22nd, 2018 11:59 PM GMT, or at Block 505083. //bitcoininterest.io/. NOTE: Snapshot block already occurred; no futures trading that I know of.
Bitcoin Rhodium (BTR): Don’t have any information on block height, the snapshot was January 10 at 23:59:59 UTC and the chain is live according to the official site. //www.bitcoinrh.org.
Bitcoin Atom (BCA): Bitcoin Atom is a SegWit enabled Bitcoin fork with atomic swaps, hybrid consensus, and lightning network. Block 505888 (occurred Jan 24, 2018). //bitcoinatom.io/. NOTE: BCA mainnet is now active, and the source code has been released – full details here: //medium.com/@bitcoinatom/bitcoin-atom-bca-releases-source-code-mainnet-b72efa4270c8. BCA is listed on CoinMarketCap.com and trades on YoBit.
Bitcoin Private (BTCP): Zclassic plans to fork Bitcoin to create Bitcoin Private (a privacy-focused Bitcoin that mashes up the features of Bitcoin Gold and Zcash/Zclassic). Zclassic holders and Bitcoin Holders will get Bitcoin Private ( BTCP), you need to hold Zclassic and Bitcoin for the fork. The supply is 19,700,000 BTCP (supply BTC + supply ZCL). Please note that you’ll likely need to hold Zclassic in a Zclassic wallet to be privy to this, thus buying and holding on Bittrex, for example, may not be enough. Snapshot date: The fork occurs February 28th, 2018 according to the official site, however no snapshot block height has been announced yet. Fork Date & Main Net Launch: Approximately 2 days after the snapshot occurs. See Zclassic Twitter: //twitter.com/zclassiccoin and Zclassic Dev’s Twitter: //twitter.com/HeyRhett
Bitcoin Hush (BTCH): Like with Zclassic, Bitcoin Hush is a proposed cross-coin fork-type-thing (an “immaculate merge fork” according to the devs). To quoth the BTCH GitHub: “For each 1 HUSH, you will get 1 BTCH. For each 1 SUPERNET, you will get 1 BTCH. For each 1 DEX, you will get 1 BTCH. For each 1 BTC, you will get 1 BTCH. BTCH takes the value from four different blockchains (HUSH, SUPERNET, DEX, BTC), and then dumps it onto a host chain Komodo (KMD).” The concept being that you can hold any or all of those coins, then you’ll configure the upcoming wallet to claim the coins. There is no block announced. The original date given was 12 pm NOON UTC on Jan 16th, 2018. However, it was moved to “a block height closest to (but not later than) 12 pm NOON UTC on Feb 1st, 2018. //bitcoinhush.github.io/ and //btchush.org/.
Quantum Bitcoin (QBTC). This fork seems to have occurred, the information on it is limited. //www.quantumbitcoin.top/.
Bitcoin LITE (BTCL): This fork seems to have occurred, the information on it is limited. https://www.bitcoinlite.net/.
BitcoinClean: BitcoinClean is a “green” Bitcoin fork (it is meant to be energy friendly in terms of mining). According to the site, the fork occurs at block 517799. The block is projected to occur Tuesday, April 18th, 2018, 4:30 am (UTC). Block 518800 will be the first bitcoinClean block. //www.bitcoinclean.org.
Bitcoin Lunar (BCL): A potential fork, almost no information about what it does online. The name implies that it will occur the first day of spring is the 20th March 2018 and at 4:20 GMT (according to their Twitter). //www.bitcoinlunar.org/
https://cryptocurrencyfacts.com/2017/12/05/upcoming-bitcoin-forks-2017-2018/
"The ONLY reason BCH is relevant is because they gave it to BTC holders for free. If they didn't, nobody would give two flying fucks."
Then let it fail on its own (lack of) merits, instead of being a sputtering lunatic everywhere you go.
"I'm so glad all of your rewards come from bots and not actual users"
Says the guy who started all the bots, then started flagging everyone for using them.
Serious question: do you believe there are any substantial organic votes happening on Steem?
Follow-up question: do you understand the basic game theory for why the previous answer is no?
"Roger is just some half baked retard who got into BTC early, there's nothing else to him."
Perhaps. If so, let his own style show that. You are harming your own claimed cause, which implies it's not your real cause, or you, again, do not understand game theory.
Being censored on steem lols. Need to post more ☺
Thanks @rogerkver. It is tough to continue to fight the good fight with all the negativity. We appreciate your work to continue to change the world for the better.
It is not important whether bitcoin or bitcoin cash is the superior platform but that the best decentralized form of money takes over and we get rid of some of Governments power over the people. You are doing a great service presenting an alternative way to move forward toward our ultimate goal. May the best win!
This is what he is talking about. It was already a censorship fight, 10 months ago.
This is actually overly generous to the r/Bitcoin side. The truth is they now rampantly edit, delete, and ban with absolutely no visible moderator record. r/Bitcoin might as well be a corporate sub locked to upvote-only.
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@lexiconical/bitcoin-scaling-s-western-front-of-propaganda-outsider-s-guide-to-the-bitcoin-subreddits
Relevant: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@lexiconical/seg-wit-is-a-trojan-horse-bitcoin-scaling-debate-explained
Good seeing you here Roger. We don't always agree about things, especially strategy and marketing I'd say (where you are a lot more aggressive and I think you would actually have more success by being more vanilla), but "censorship" and manipulation is not an argument. (Many will say it's only the trolls or off-topic shilling spammers that get banned, but I've seen up front there's more going on than simply that.)
You're doing mostly good with r/BTC currently, but I'd warn you; There's a lot of sock puppeting and brigading going on also in that sub. I've noticed clearly unorganic voting behavior, especially on posts from tight group of CSW supporters. These people - irregardless of your opinion about a man who in private promised to reveal proof publicly of being Satoshi but didn't - are not good for the community. Unless you want to see the real users pushed out in favor of an artificially cheering crowd, better means of communication will have to be developed. There or elsewhere.
Maybe Memo.Cash is a good start for something new, maybe Yours.org will become more mainstream, and in any case maybe Steem and interfaces like Busy.org can be an inspiration to your and others. In any case I hope you'll feel at home here. (even if you're post rewards will probably show zero if berniesanders downvotes you)
I'm for rallying behind THIS post as a rally point for future discord...
Posts on SteemIt represent a decentralized information economy.
As a PUBLIC SCI-FI AUTHOR myself, I have been immutably "on the record"
for my support of Bitcoin Cash as early as last year. I'm not saying I KNOW better, just POSTING my Stand ; )
I've been backing BCH since the fork. Core and Lightning Network are complete GARBAGE!
BCH is garbage a bunch of cry babies that could not get their way to they piggy backed off bitcoins name to make money lol
With you Roger!!!! This message needs to get out and people need to understand what Bitcoin Cash really is about!!! best, ~Sean
Your biggest fan, and a hardcore BCH supporter. I even wrote an article on you, We have faith in you. Just keep supporting the community.
Highly rEsteemed!
wow .
valuable information .
very nice
Thank you for sharing your post
Yeah! Bitcoin is really booming, but I know my steem will soon take the baton....hahahha
Amy often gets crippled for vapor censorship but you can get it!
Thanks for the return of Steven Rocker! There is no censorship of stem blocks here..
Congratulations, your post received 19.42% up vote form @spydo courtesy of @lexiconical! I hope, my gratitude will help you getting more visibility.
You can also earn by making delegation. Click here to delegate to @spydo and earn 95% daily reward payout! Follow this link to know more about delegation benefits.
It's right BCH is one of the rival of btc you can say ..but taking BCH above BTC ??we have to think twice .I like BCH but I also don't hate BTC
There's no reason to hate BTC just because you like or find BCH interesting. Unless you buy into the idea that one will kill the other and that whichever is killed should belong to the camp with "lesser people in it", you can support development on both chains and watch how they perform side by side in the market place.
Ignore the toxicity spread. There are also a lot of positive emotions and developments. It's just easier to make yourself heard in a smaller group and also easier to create sock puppets to manipulate and spread negativity.
It will all pass in time and as better forms of communication are created.
In crypto comparing one with another doesn't sounds good .
Competition is healthy whenever there is a better alternative. If a coin can't compete at least in some manner, it is not really worth anything.
It’s gonna be hilarious when FB TWTR YOUTUBE and everyone censoring shit comes running back when they can’t stop this crypto movement. Can’t see the forest for the trees worth shit.
This could be interesting if @rogerkver notices our big frog in our little pond. 😎
Bernie's wallet
Roger's wallet
Can someone explain how the Bitcoin core Bitcoin cash debate is more complex than transaction cost and transaction speed? As a consumer, faster, less expensive transactions should win out every time.
Thoughts?
I like that new BCH tumblr website idea Roger
You prefer BCH, fine, use any coin you want. But lying and saying that it's called "Bitcoin" is dishonest and harmful to everyone.

Ignoring 14 instances of the word 'trust' within the white paper (all in the context of the need to remove it) and only quoting the title will work on some people, some of the time. Those who dig deeper will realise that 'cheap payments' was not the motivation behind the work.
Shame on rogerkver and anyone else who takes part in this outright fraud and deception.
Obviously, the so called crypto community is more of a religion, than their members will dare to believe. Anyways, time is on our side.
It's definitely true..... Can't wait to see this bloom; keep up the good work
Your Post Has Been Featured on @Resteemable!
Feature any Steemit post using resteemit.com!
How It Works:
1. Take Any Steemit URL
2. Erase
https://
3. Type
re
Get Featured Instantly & Featured Posts are voted every 2.4hrs
Join the Curation Team Here | Vote Resteemable for Witness
I literally feel that this post has caused a war and the armies are fighting hard on both sides.
you got my support, man!
I didn't eden know he was here. More reasons to use steemit,no censorship here
I like BTC and BCH and think they both deserve a seat at the table. I respect you Roger and everything you do to help crypto in general along. It was nice meeting you in Mexico at Anarchapulco.....(I'm the guy who gave you the free Vice token door hangers) Keep doing what you do man, and don't get down by these downvoters. I think this entire community will turn all the gun barrels on these haters someday soon and this will all be sorted out. Thanks for coming back to Steemit....this platform need smart people like you,
Price target $1600.
Bitcoin cash = trash 😝
Bigger blocks is only a short term solution❕
You're an idiot, as your blog can rapidly convince anyone of.
Do You think I care?
Everybody is always so sure of them selves in crypto.. Everybody shouting their favorite coin
Moore's law says otherwise. Bigger blocks is a long term exponential scaling solution.
Its not all about Moores law.. Dont make sense anymore in future.
BlockChain blocks aren't transistors
That's completely irrelevant.
Besides, Mores Law is used more as a euphemism for rapid technological innovation. Even if Mores Law is broken, that doesn't necessarily mean much in the long run.
If you think for a minute, you realize that it cant precisely double each year⚠️
its a stupid law these times.
do they want to double blocksize each year❓🤣
I think you need to revisit my above comment.
The blocksize can be any necessary. We might find better ways to scale in the future, who knows. LN for example is a great experiment, but unfortunately doesn't qualify yet.
I agree that it is a very good experiment.
They should coexist.
Once LN or another solution works well enough, we might not need to scale further or as fast on chain. But currently on chain 0-conf transactions on Bitcoin Cash are clearly superior.
It's frustrating to see that censorship still exists on a decentralised platform like steem. I wish we could have proved ourselves better but unfortunately this system empowers greedy trolls and runs the masses off the platform in search of alternatives.
I actually started my podcast group (Voices of the Underground) because of the issue of censorship - more specifically self censorship - on steem because the monetary rewards create these incentives in favour of popular opinion and with reputation systems on top of that there's so much reluctance to say anything that has such high opportunity costs.
That social experiment is pretty terrifying!
We use the podcast to discuss a lot of ideas mainly behind blockchain technology and cryptocurrency based applications. We're big advocates of eos simply because of Dan Larimer and the fast transaction blockchain we've been interacting with each other on but we talk about absolutely everything and especially the potential and impact of blockchain technology.
If you'd ever be interested on coming onto the show to discuss bitcoin cash and what's been going on with the politics of bitcoin we would be thrilled to have you.
https://discord.me/votu
^ Where we host the show every Sunday.
So first you say something that makes no sense on a blockchain like "censorship" than you go on to promote your project for the rest of the comment, got it.
I can't believe that a seasoned Steem influencer such as you is calling downvotes censorship. This lively debate is the proof, if you need any, against that claim.
So-called self-censorship is nothing more than a metaphor. The rewards are a powerful incentive to do what's going to get you rewards, so while it works as a euphemism it's obviously not actual censorship.
Thank you, exactly my thoughts.
I for one more often read flagged comments than regular ones. :D
Yea I usually check out what the fuss is all about 😂
These flags are just in your minds ;) I can't see any of them on Busy.org.
There is contradiction in the parent comment of @beanz ,it may be some true but the second part of comment is endorsement to their project. How can downvote be a censorship that too created for some self benifit.
Provide some space to breath!!!!!
Indeed, on r/btc you will be down voted by hundreds of paid trolls when you say something positive about BTC / negative about BCH (while it is r/BTC), he is lying at bitcoincom and tricking people in buying his altcoin while telling them it is Bitcoin. He is a scammer and when certain platforms delete scams that is their full right. He use the word censorship to make others look bad, but he is a master manipulator / scammer
Here's a great teardown that goes in depth technically and historically -- https://hackernoon.com/thats-not-bitcoin-that-s-bcash-f730f0d0a837
I recommend you read it, or anyone else who wants to understand why Very Wrong Ver is in fact, wrong.
I think you missed the point if you think he's just talking about himself being censored.
This is a cute way of duping people into forgetting that bitcoin cash is A CLONE (fork) of bitcoin, unlike any altcoin.
There's more than 2 bitcoin networks now. Get used to it.
What the fuck is BCash ?
We're talking about
BITCOIN CASH BRO
:)
Bitcoin classic is gonna be left behind.
It is called Bcash because it is a failed update (Bitcoin works with a consensus mechanism do you understand?) of the Bitcoin protocol. Since it is failed (only 5% consensus) it can't carry the BITCOIN name. BTC is Bitcoin and BCH is Bcash
Indeed. Bitcoin is the chain originating from the genesis block with the highest accumulated proof of work. The Bitcoin Cash fork failed to gain majority, thus it is not Bitcoin.
In practice this is actually a fairly shortsighted way of looking at it, because accumulated proof of work only becomes the deciding factor once other necessary attributes have been confirmed.
(This btw is the only good reason underlying why so many have been sucked into the populist notion that users voting with so called "full nodes" - that don't fulfill the criteria for being called nodes as laid out in the design paper - can be an acceptable governance mechanism, when it is in fact much too easily manipulated.)
So you didn't see what I did there .... That just went waaaay over your head didn't it ....
you do realize that bitcoin cash devs are just as bad if not worse in terms of hacking and shit right?