Bits and Pieces - Decentralized Technology is Key

2년 전

Everything you will ever need to know about The Blockchain you keep hearing about. Did you know that it is all on the blockchain already?

The Blockchain.

I keep hearing so many companies talking about how they are planning to put it on the blockchain. Blockchain is not new or different. Blockchain is not innovative or exciting. The Blockchain without context is vague and ambiguous at best.

The Blockchain

Let's compare the ever annoying undifinded "the blockchain" with a comparative "the paper blockchain." Here's your blockchain technology.

Blockchain, is a book filled with pages, each sheet of paper is a block of sorts, and each holds a certain amount of transactions.

They are kept in a single location, the accountant's office. Done. Every page is totaled and balanced to make sure money is not lost or mishandled. The accountant is the only one who makes changes and signs his name affirming that the numbers are valid.

Simply putting these pages into blocks, run on computers, does not make anything better or worse. No money on this blockchain is more secure than a wallet in the pocket of someone who is passed out.

There is nothing new here - move on...

Governments and other ignorant people have tried, successfully, to divert everyone's attention from the real innovation which is the kind of blockchain. They tell you that money is secure on the blockchain, but a ledger in the hands of the central bank, for example, has been proven to destroy value in the currency being blockedchained on those ledgers in centralized locations. Yeah, it gets printed a lot.

Hey let's send our package via currier - he will put it in "The Car" and it will arrive fast.

TheCar.jpg

How about putting it in the fast car or the safe car? It is not "the blockchain" that is important, but the preceding adjective. What kind of blockchain? Use "a decentralized" blockchain or ledger. "Distributed" so it cannot be crushed or confiscated.

The Blockchain, Which One?

Since they never say which blockchain, I will default to our paper comparison. Which accountant should I use? There are many different accountants, each is a blockchain, and the only thing that makes the system work is that you trust the accountant with just the numbers, then you trust the bank where your money is. When the accountant or bank becomes incompetent, your money is not secure on that central blockchain. The one you want is at the end of the next section.

The ones with the innovation.

There are thousands of Bitcoin copycats, and new ICO opportunities popping up daily. Some do not even use blockchains. For the sake of simplicity, let's use Bitcoin as a single example. Many years before Bitcoin actually worked, it had ledgers. They tried spending and receiving money, but there were weaknesses. Dishonest people could try to spend the same money twice, and dishonest miners could hack accounts and take money. The answer became obvious to Satoshi, who took out the trust factor. With Bitcoin, you do not have to place your trust in any person, or entity. This is called an open source, decentralized, distributed ledger that happens to use the mundane chain of blocks.

blockgeegs.jpg
source This author is not in total agreement with the above representation. The truth is users can be anonymous while their wallet address is public. Bitcoin is both distributed and decentralized, plus permission to have a copy of the ledger and mine is never required.

The real innovation of our example includes:

  • Many developers in their homes worldwide...
  • Producing publicly auditable code for free that would be...
  • Run on many different privately owned computers worldwide to...
  • Find blocks of transactions and confirm each one...
  • Over a long period of time (10 minutes each) which...
  • Prevents anyone from spending money twice and...
  • Self motivates these individuals (miners) with payments...
  • Mined into existence on a set curve and...
  • Nothing, but nothing can stop the process short of a world-wide power outage

hundreds of coins today meet or exceed the above innovations and your coin does not have to have a blockchain.

In other words you need to look for ...

a ledger thing-a-ma-bob or similar which is ...

distributed worldwide, unhackable, and inherently trustworthy.

You want an open source, decentralized, crypto-coin!

and it matters not if it uses a blockchain, tangle, meshfirmation, or whatever

  • Look for one that has a long history - never hacked.
  • Check that it is open source.
  • Make that you have your private keys.
  • Do not hand your money to strangers
  • On-line exchanges are the unregulated strangers.
  • On-line web-wallets are also unregulated strangers.

spacerhtooms.jpeg

On Line Exchanges

Online exchanges take care of putting the accountant and your money in the same place. Using them puts your money in the hands of one entity, with no laws in place to make them accountable. They do not even have to give your money back to you when you want to withdraw it!

That is the description of a stranger who asks for money, you say yes, and he shows you that he still has it via his DOT COM which he bought on go-daddy.

esxchangeregs.jpg

There is nearly no chance that our aging congressmen have the will or knowledge required to make laws which would take down exchange sites. They currently ban paper money from being changed into virtual currency, albeit debit paper, credit paper, paypal paper or any other plastic dollars they find. But getting your Bitcoins back? There is no real regulation on web exchanges. Do you trust that?

If said website owner lets their name and location be known, they could be arrested and charged with some unrelated crime written ages ago for another completely different purpose. Then convicted and jailed. Hmm, maybe.

There is zero regulation for Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dash, etc.

This is not a problem, it is a feature!

Decentralized exchanges are already here.

There is zero regulation for decentralized exchanges.

This is also not a problem, but a feature!

short of a world-wide power outage, regulation = none possible.

OpenLedger, aka Bitshares is not regulated.

There is no need for regulation when coins are held on a decentralized distributed exchange. There is no *.com owner controlling the wallet! Like Bitcoin, you have your private keys.

Code is not greedy, it serves to pass coins to the destination. Money either arrives or returns to you. Code does not steal.

We do not need to worry about centralized exchanges, they will put themselves out of business simply because they are exposed, identifiable, and check out this word, CENTRAL! Like a nail that sticks up, governments will hammer them down.

spacerhtooms.jpeg

The governments of the world might use "The Blockchain" soon.

Now you know which one.

  • The one they own...
  • that has a proprietary code
  • with blocks of transactions confirmed over time...
  • in a central location...
  • by government owned miners and...
  • user wallet balances that can be changed to zero...
  • by the same, said government.

This is a problem, not a feature

Corporate owned blockchains will present you, the user, with this same problem.

spacerhtooms.jpeg

So...

The next thousand times you hear them say the words on the blockchain, you now know which one they are talking about. The crypto-petro of Venezuela, the crypto-ruble of Russia, Ripple from its inception, and whatever coin the 85-year-old congressmen come up with for the U.S.A. are the coin types they are referring to.

Blockchain + Centralized + Corporate = Bank

Banks are problems, not solutions.

Disclaimer:

I do not own any Bitcoin, I am not Satoshi, I mean no harm to go-daddy, and I own none of the cars pictured above. The information and facts provided here are truthful, simple comparisons in order to inform people of the stupid things they may do if they have not read all of the above.


This is in no way an endorsement of Bitcoin which is nearly unidentifiable over the last year or so, including a period of time during which Western Union was faster and less expensive. I used the crypto-currency Bitcoin only as a well known example.

Thanks for taking time...

Remember. Your job is to make sure people know that simply putting it "on the blockchain" does NOT mean that it is on the Bitcoin (or another reliable decentralized) blockchain.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

and whatever coin the 85-year-old congressmen come up with for the U.S.A. LOL

I love how you break your posts down- even my mom would be able to grasp this- the mark of a gifted teacher ;)

·

I had a couple other digs in there aimed at , well, others. I left just that one in there.

·
·

You should have left them all- digs are fun ;)

Very interesting and thought-provoking article. The crushing of the ability of central banksters to LITERALLY run the economies and lives of all the nations of the developed world is, to me, the paramount advantage of distributed ("anonymous") blockchain technology.

Cryptocurrency is as big a revolution in the way the world works as free (or extremely cheap) energy technologies would have been, had not TPTB killed these inventors and stole (and burned, or hid) those patents. Maybe moreso even, because the total wealth (and wealth-making practices) of the world is potentially in play with these emerging "peoples' currencies," whereas it is possible to imagine sectors of economies that are not energy-dependent.

The one thing that dampens my enthusiasm is the term "unhackable." I don't believe ANYTHING, in the very end, is totally unhackable. What we in the cryptocurrency revolution must hope for (and hopefully bring about) are security successes/systems that allow the wealth to be more equitably/meritoriously distributed from the elites to the world, before they can enact their hegemony. In other words, are our programmers better/smarter/more innovative, than their hackers, or v.v.?

That will determine the future of the planet.

·

Great comment. Thanks. The Bitcoin code is not the secure part, it is that someone would have to persuade a couple thousand miners to change over and adopt a code with fallibilities within. The distributed and of this ledger is like taking a bank inside out spreading the fragments everywhere in the world. But, each fragment would contain every transaction that bank had every made (and all copies have to match). That is the genius of the distributed ledger.

Another example would be if someone wanted to edit one of Shakespeare's works. Because they exist in many personal libraries and public ones. Then there are private homes that have them anonymously. How would a hacker get into every home and library and flawlessly edit all copies? This is what I mean by unhackable. Not impossible but highly unlikely. Pleasant day!

I didn't use the Bl....word because that is not the heart of the security!

·
·

A couple thousand is all they'd have to round up? Hmmm...

Very informative reply. Thanks!

Tutorials are very useful. Thanks for sharing.

Thank you @htooms for the explanantion.

Your tutorial is timely.......'blockchain' is the new buzz word it would seem.

All the best to you.

Cheers.

NB Do hope you are well.

·

I am very well, thanks. I have so many things up in the air, I need more time to post.

Timely. This is not just a buzz-word, it's propaganda so that people will accept anything stamped, "Blockchain" without question. I hope there are people out there that will read and be informed.

·
·

Thank you for your reply @htooms.

You are correct. Thank you for the distinction......as it does send red signals when it is repeated by those who deny the validity of crytocurrencies.

Is it true that if there was no cryptocurrency...there would be no blockchain? I have heard that said.

All the best.

Cheers.

Excellent post dear friend @htooms, I admire the practicality of your work, always as explicit and easy to understand, as for the understanding of the masses, without doubt the block chain is the best invention so far, many organizations are putting their processes in the blockchain. and it is true there will always be the unscrupulous who want to divert people's attention.
You are very kind in taking the time to give this magnificent explanation
I wish you a great day

A truly honest no nonsense explanation of blockchains and the important differences between centralised and de-centralised ones. Thanks for sharing,Resteemed to 5000+ followers.✌️

  ·  2년 전

Thanks for the upvote :) I've missed you for a while didn't have time to follow, just wanted to express my gratitude :P I'm kind of liking the page as well, but I will read a bit later :)

feel free to check out my vids on Dlive :P I'm open for suggestions as well, plus I would say Dlive is pretty good, even if it's centralised :D

So yeah based on the graphic Steem is a second generation permisioned blockchain, users are public and the data is transparent, miners are selected and not decentralised :P so the closest thing on steem in comparison to decentralisation is the disorganisation of the user base :D

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, because I know others may have echoed or will echo same sentiment down in the comment, I think this is the best, simple, straight-to-the-point-no-fluff explanation of the term blockchain which many erroneously take to be the synonym for freedom. It ain't freedom if it's not decentralised. Thank you for taking out time to drop this.

·

Every time I hear the term, all of the above goes through my mind. I want people NOT to fall for the hype. Thanks for reading.

·
·

You've done a good job. Thank you.

Yeah, decentralized exchanges will lift off soon, because people still don't realize the way everything works here. Bitshares is definitely going to be on the top and it will be widely used. Right now it's still very undervalued since nobody understands how good a decentralized exchange is. I guess people will start realizing it once the governments are screwing up all those centralized exchages.

·
  ·  2년 전

It's undervalued because the other exchanges offer better "service" and people enjoy graphics and marketing speeches, plus you get articles as well ... :D sooo coinbase is the best one ...

I've been thinking it's great ever since i got there, apart from the low liquidity it's a nice exchange, maybe too botty like steem but they are still flagships in their fields. I haven't checked out the waves exchange, but everything turns out stale after the marketing and the graphics hype settles down ...

·

They have hit coinbsase hard, MasterCard and Visa are trying to detect crypto purchases, I have a feeling that the next dig may be pulling wallet apps off the Andriod and Apple stores. So back up your .apk files.

Bitshares? The exchange is secure! I love the coin. Easy to quadruple your paper on that one. I got 75k BTS at the low 0.10 range and have the 2X value already - I know it will go back near or past $1 soon.

·
·
  ·  2년 전

humm maybe a bit too far, 1$ is quite high, so far regulations have a negative effect on the market, maybe if bitcoin booms again ... that's another topic, It's strange how in a supposedly decentralised market there is a central player that dominates the whole cap :D

This your content very interesting.. Good job sir.