Korean Business Adopts Bitcoin Cash & Drop Bitcoin Core (BTC)

2년 전

Korea is one of the hot spots for cryptocurrency innovation and adoption. Be a fly on the wall as myself and the Bitcoin.com spread Bitcoin Cash through Seoul and the rest of South Korea.

If you enjoy the behind the scenes vlogs, we love hearing from you and hearing your story, so don't forget to hit the like button and post a comment under the video.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

Just curious on why the post was down-voted?

·

Roger Ver is now a con-man, openly an enemy of Bitcoin. He's been hindering adoption of a global fair money at least 10x more than any good he might have done to BTC in the past.

BTC fees have been arround 1sat per bytes for the last 8 months. It went down to ~3 cents per tx when some scumbags (maybe Bitmain / big-blocker cabal) stopped spamming the chain for political influence.

BCH opted for "Transfer of va..." which is hard to do without "store of value".

They should change name because 99% of the value BCH currently has is literally stolen from BTC via confusion and deceptive marketing like shown proudly in the video.

·
·

Correct. Since the Cashies love FACTS - here's a few:

BCash is DECLINING as a method to do, well, anything except baghold -- https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-cash-commercial-use-shrinks/

Is mostly speculative -- https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1004995365202886656

Roger Ver's fork is the only fork of Bitcoin that is trying to usurp the name, pretend that it is the original, and dupe newbies into thinking it is too.

https://de.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7jzpir/after_roger_ver_openly_admitting_that_he_will/

Here's a direct example of his usual sleazy antics:

Ver BTC BCH Lies

Do you Cashies understand what that is? Its no better than doing this:

BCash Fake Knockoffs

But you guys think he's such a "great" guy and you keep repeating his talking points like it makes sense. Is that what you people are? A bunch of following little puppets that can't think for yourselves?

How about this article about the LACK of any progress by BCash -- https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-cash-commercial-use-shrinks/

You guys are 1 Year+ in and you don't have squat. Starting to see the picture?

So that is what you're dealing with, someone who would absolutely LIE to your face, just to promote his ego-coin, doesn't care if you have a future at all, and will throw you under the bus when its convenient.

Bottom line, Roger Ver is a politician. He has the mindset, and even ran for California Assembly way back:

Ver Politician

See that fucking sign? That's his last name in BIG BLOCK LETTERS. Because he's like most politicians, when they open their mouths -- all that tumbles out is lies, designed to PLAY you, and keep you doing exactly what he wants you to do.

So, you going to think for yourselves, or do you follow this ego-centric maniac off the BCash cliff? Because that cliff is approaching. Forkday for you Cashies is not going to be a celebration, it will be a newbie slaughter.

·
·

Bullshit. Let the market decide. Maybe the flags are in place of a rational argument? If the market decides, why be worried?

·
·
·

Does an exchange suddenly list the S&P 500, but call it SP500Cash?

Does Honda copy the Mustang, but calls it Mustang Cash?

Does another country's treasury start printing Yuan notes and calls it Yuan Cash?

You are enabling a liar to spread his lies, dupe newbies with his duplicitous and false claims -- yet you say its the "market".

The only "market" here, is how far Roger Ver will go with his ego to shove the falsehoods down your throat.

But I know you're the head boot-licker, so I don't expect any traction.

BCash is a litmus test for logic and ethics -- and you failed it.

·
·
·
·

Does Honda copy the Mustang, but calls it Mustang Cash?

Why would a car company add cash to its name? I get what you are trying to say here, but by that logic, why ETH and ETC?

If the coin is shit, as you seem to think, the market will show this.

You guys all sound pretty whiny. Where’s the argument?

But I know you're the head boot-licker, so I don't expect any traction

I am? That is news to me! I’m just a blogger nobody that is interested in both coins.

Oh well.

·
·
·
·
·

The classic ETH is ETC.

The new ETH fork won the economic majority as commodity based blockchain resource. (near useless as a store of value either-ways)

BCH did not.

Monies are not commodities to one-another.

BCH will either take over BTC or will die a slow dead, I think the later bet is safer.

·
·
·
·
·
·

So BCH did not win the majority. Thus the name was changed. What’s the big deal?

·
·
·
·
·

You are arguing in very simplistic terms. Are you drunk?

I don't care about forks of Bitcoin that want different rules.

I do care about forks of Bitcoin PRETENDING THEY ARE BITCOIN.

Guess which fork of many is doing that?

That's right, BCash.

And you still can't see it? Either you're concern trolling, or you have some mental block with logic.

If this is the quality of people that Roger Ver attracts to his cause, no wonder they're floundering like idiots.

·
·
·
·
·
·

All caps. Bizarre insults. No actual argument or pertinent rebuttal. This is about what I expected, unfortunately. Have a good day.

·
·
·
·
·
·
·

No answer to the mimicry and attempted usurping of Bitcoin?

So that is what passes for logic in your world, a head buried in the tarpit of ignorance.

Pathetic.

·
·

Transisto you need to at least recognize that Core developers (regardless of motivations) made a system that looks nothing like the Bitcoin design at this point. I can't even recognize the sound money that Satoshi invented just a few years ago.

BTC opted for store of value, which is very very hard to do without having some basic use value. All of the Austrian economists knew this. Same for having a quota on blockspace that is set below market demand. That makes it a fractional reserve system.

Bitcoin Cash is at least still usable as cash. The money people held is still accessible with their private keys. It at least adheres to the design. If you dislike Roger (I know he has his flaws), that's understandable. But I'm still not ready to call him a conman merely for saying that Bitcoin Cash essentially is Bitcoin or for being aggressive in his marketing and business deals. Not any more than the Core crowd conned me and still cons people using Bitcoin.org, r/Bitcoin and BitcoinTalk. They're only far more successful at it so far.

·
·
·

You are so far down into the BCash pit, you can't even see the sky.

For the newbies and those who are willing to read something (I know you sure as hell won't), I suggest this article on "The Bitcoin Standard" a excellent book by Saifedean Ammous.

https://medium.com/@craigjaquish/saifedean-ammouss-the-bitcoin-standard-the-new-standard-for-bitcoin-books-173f16e224a7

Money has traditionally had three facets: medium of exchange, store of value, and unit of account.

Vijay has a great twitter thread on this here, and how BCash has flubbed it -- https://twitter.com/real_vijay/status/1031686632137605121?s=19

You can't just pick one facet and discard the other - like Roger Ver has with BCash.

For Bitcoin, scaling has been achieved by using the broadcast model as the base, with layers built on top like Lightning for extensibility -- https://medium.com/@melik_87377/lightning-network-enables-unicast-transactions-in-bitcoin-lightning-is-bitcoins-tcp-ip-stack-8ec1d42c14f5

Anything else doesn't make sense - TCP/IP is built this way, and so is Bitcoin.

All the Cashies have is yet-another-fork coming because you guys are floundering in the dark -- https://twitter.com/CobraBitcoin/status/1032777354643496961

And you rationalize the mimicry and blatant scamming by saying its "aggressive marketing"?

Is everyone in BCash as ethically compromised as you? It would explain a LOT of what is going on.

You're doomed to fail, and we're trying to save you -- and the newbies.

Pay attention.

·
·

Thank you!

·

Banksters.

Now lets track revenues, from the quarter before, and after the switch... lol

·

Absolutely. Why not. That's what you'd expect any business to do.

·
·

You'd be surprised.... I've seen many smaller businesses who just operate without reallt analyzing quarterly financials more than sending an email to their cpa...

Good work Roger. I appreciate your contribution to Steemit. It's a shame you can't get the monetary reward for your post that you deserve.

Looking forward to getting one of these if the price is right!