COVID-19 Tests Don't Actually Test for COVID-19?

8개월 전

Two days ago I came across a post on FB where an anonymous person was saying they worked in the healthcare system, and that the tests for COVID-19 weren't testing for COVID-19, but any strain of coronavirus. You can read this in the quote below.

Then I also came across an analysis video that allegedly looks at how the testing is being done, and what they are looking for: exosomes. But, exosomes are found in the body as a result of many conditions in the body, which include:

Untitled-1.jpg

Is this is true, then there are so many false positives for alleged cases of COVID-19 out there.

Check out the video at the bottom of the post for yourself. I can't verify if this is true, but it could be, as what he is saying makes sense.

A healthcare workers says the tests dont test for COVID-19,a nd another analysis says the tests are testing for exosomes that can be due to many other reasons. What do you think?


From medical forum (Prefers to stay anonymous, presenting a different narrative than the official one can cost you a lot in the toxic environment these days.) I work in the healthcare field. Here's the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments. This is why you're hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That's because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues. The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues. The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense. And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load. If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if a osteogenesis is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you. If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis. And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen. Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus. They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common. There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time. All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease. Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die. You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on. Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist. Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically. Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people you are mislabelling – your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.

But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.

  1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.
  2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.
  3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.
  4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.
    Take these simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.
    They can not "confirm" something for which there is no accurate test.

Doctor explains the COVID deception.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

@krnel, Thanks for this, it is a meaningful chunk of information for what is going on "Right Now". Couple of things to consider when it comes to the CDC and the FDA, (1) the CDC is the worlds largest holder of medicinal patents and (2) they are NOT a part of the US gov't.
A viable test for a "New" virus takes anywhere from 3 to 7 months to develop and can take up to a year to develop a viable vaccine for that virus. remember, the have to incubate and grow a BUNCH of the virus in order for it to die then the proteins can be used to develop the specific vaccine.
For the inner workings of the CDC you need look no further than the way they handle "Flu Shots" every year. The CDC acknowledges that they do a "best guess" when it comes to a "Seasonal flu shot" because they DO NOT have a viable sample, yet, so you have about a 10% chance of getting a shot that is close enough to do any good and only about 18% of the recipients actually get any benefit from the shot.
So, accurate test now? that would be "NO", FDA releasing a vaccine for testing, that would be "only in your dreams" from our government.
Mitch,

·

Yeah, there are lots of smoke and mirrors that they are passing off the rest of us as concrete reality. Big deception on many levels.

Here is what you would have to do to test for COVID-19

Take the sample,
kill everything,
separate out the DNA and RNA,
recombine and lengthen them,
put them through a DNA analyzer (one type uses a laser to burn each micro drop that is squeezed out of a tiny tube, and the reflected light from each burned piece gives you a letter code... sorta)

And then compare that DNA signature with that of COVID-19.

It just ain't happening.

So, most tests for viruses test for a lack of some chemical (what the virus ate) or the excess of some chemical (what the virus shat out)

And both of these are really poor, as there are millions of ways to get a false positive.

And false negatives can easily be gotten just by swabbing the wrong area.

·

Yeah it seems this is supposed to take a while, yet they "have" the test quickly.

So you got this from an anonymous Facebook post, very enlightening.

I just thought on 5G. Nice that you have the same thoughts. Resteemed