Hoping To Direct Hate
In light of the second part of my last post, it was with interest that I read this recent newspaper article. The article equates to a commentary on a recent Hope Not Hate (who are a UK based anti-fascism charity) conspiracy theory poll and an interview with its author Patrik Hermansson. Before we continue, it's worth noting that over the course of three years and across multiple articles I have vehemently spoken out against and broken down the fallacies and rhetoric of the entire left/right mind control paradigm.
I have referenced my belief that people are being algorithmically nudged towards the extremes of their political ideologies and commented upon how these increasingly weaponised divide and conquer tactics are being used as a means to erode the already fraying vestiges of social cohesion and unity. I have observed and documented the conflagrated left/ right, alt-left/alt-right, far-left/far-right, march towards confrontation, indoctrination, and free speech subjugation.
I relay statements purely because the logic of Hope Not Hate dictates that anyone who steps outside the confines of their narrow worldview must be a member of the extreme far-right. A movement that justifies their very existence and thus must be lurking around every corner, poised to inject their “hate” into the gullible minds of the disenfranchised and discombobulated.
The funny thing is, by previously carrying out a modicum of research, it becomes apparent that Hope Not Hate mirror what they purport to fight. Simplifications check, over generalisations check, intimidatory tactics check, discrimination check, fear of the unknown checkmate! Through psychological subversion and puerile propaganda, they hope to direct hate to all that block the pathway to their political and perceptual absolutism.
Beware The Conspiracy Extremist!!
As a charity that is focused upon anti-fascism Hope Not Hate must always have a plentiful supply of bogeymen, thus the subject of their recent ire is the conspiracy extremist! No middle ground with these guys!! Whilst I fully acknowledge and very much respect the work of numerous independent researchers and truth seekers; anyone that has followed my writing will know that I have concerns around certain elements (that I feel are doing far more harm than good) within the echo chambers and peripheries of a “truth movement” that has become increasingly fractured, divided, politicised, and contemptuous of opposing viewpoints.
Still, some of the simplistic equations they’re trying to build in this article are fairly startling. As the article continues we can also observe why they have attempted to draw truth back into political idealogies where people are easier to categorise and label.
“You start with something that does not seem very dangerous, but it’s very easy to travel from there to directly hateful ideas against minorities,” he said.
“Social media companies need to start looking at conspiracy theories as they do with other extremism and clamp down harder.”
So the implications within these short (in context) paragraphs are that those who have concerns about vaccination are extremists. Equally, here we can observe a Manchester University study that concludes “children of mentally ill Mothers are much less likely to be vaccinated.” This might be true, but does that also imply that mothers that fail to vaccinate are mentally ill? Or a play on words that speaks to the nature of subconscious interpretation? But back to the aforementioned article where it it states:
Almost one in five people indicated belief in anti-vaccination conspiracy theories, with 18 per cent agreeing that inoculations have hidden harmful effects. Source
Chief Superintendent Nik Adams, national coordinator of the Prevent programme, told The Independent false claims linking 5G technology to the spread of coronavirus were being “monitored very closely”.
“It’s being pushed out by extreme right-wing groups as a hook to get people onto chat forums, where they can then talk about other hate-related conspiracy theories and draw people into their narratives,” he added.
For those that are unaware, Prevent is the UK’s counter-terrorism strategy. For several years I have been writing about how the world of conspiracy theories would be eventually drawn into the terror, hate, and mental health arenas. Once these connections have been made they would be used as the justification to restructure broader free speech definitions and mandated "truth" stipulations. Below we can find a tweet from Manchester police that I borrowed from a great post by @shepz1.
“From that, they can pick up those individuals who are must vulnerable to encourage them, radicalise them and take them towards terrorism.” Source
Against the backdrop of increased pressure, a fearful society searching for answers, social imbalances, and exponential rises in mental health, we can begin to observe how such a framework could be maneuvered into place.
Yes, I'm very aware of the nature of symbols and numerological connections to deeper meanings, but the conspiratorial coincidences/hidden messages that pop up in mainstream reporting and technological advances appear to be gathering momentum and becoming increasingly blatant. Within our current environment, it almost seems as if those with susceptible and potentially delusional mind frames are being trolled, increasingly vilified, and nudged towards some form of reaction, perhaps a future stochastic terror event.
I'm also keenly much aware that there will obviously be valid genuine coincidences amongst this, but I keep a keen on phraseology, numerology and symbology, and recent accelerations exceed the realms of chance. Even within the same article, we can observe elements of this potential conspiracy coincidence trolling, it first discusses Agenda 21 and then goes onto state.
Here we can observe how a Californian man was detained under the mental health act for speaking out about and attempting to arm himself against a Bill Gates directed coronavirus vaccine plot, that made people trackable through 5G towers.
5G was also the theory that had been seen by the largest group of people (37 per cent), followed by claims that coronavirus was developed by China as a biological weapon (35 per cent) and that it was “intentionally released as part of a depopulation plan by the UN or New World Order (21 per cent). Source
As pressure begins to increase, people lose their jobs, finances and relationships become strained, the control and surveillance system becomes ever more apparent, and the tension and rhetoric more palpable; I very much feel that we could be moving towards an event (or events) that will be seized upon and framed in such a way that they erode the principles of free speech and independent journalism.
A sequence of unfortunate (potentially engineered) flashpoints (possibly around the lockdown, 5G or the impending vaccination programme) could see the “conspiracy theorist” or “anti vaxxer” repackaged as public enemy number one? I no longer feel this potentiality exists beyond the realms of possibility.
In response to questions, the respondent was said to be aggressive and confrontational, ranting and fidgeting. At one point he allegedly said, "people are going to try and get me and I need to defend myself". Source
Further Mental Health Equations
Within this article we can observe how German medical lawyer Beate Bahner was committed to a psychiatric institution for inciting a public protest and issuing a press release that voiced opposition to her governments coronavirus measures. Within her 25 year career Bahner has authored five books on medical law and won three cases before the Federal Constitutional Court (German Supreme Court). Here is an excerpt from her statement.
Below is Miss Bahner's synopsis of her detainment.
In particular, these measures are not justified by the Infection Prevention Act, which was hurriedly amended just a few days ago. Long-term restrictions on leaving home and meeting others, based on high-death-rate modelled scenarios (which fail to take account of actual critical expert opinions), and the complete shutdown of businesses and shops with no proof that they pose any risk of infection, are thoroughly unlawful. Source
I went into the garage and found a car following me suspiciously. After standing in front of my car for ten minutes, I sensed something was not right and ran back out of the garage. Stupidly, I didn't run into the house, because my secretary had gone to get her car on Voss-strasse and she just didn't show up again … I asked a passing car to call the police for me. They simply kept refusing to [respond] for five minutes, and then I realised it had been a huge mistake to call the police, because at the moment I'm Number One Enemy of the State.
When the police did arrive, I told them I felt threatened. They brought the handcuffs out and pushed me to the ground with massive force. They kept me sitting in their car for ten minutes with my hands cuffed behind my back, then they drove me around the corner to the psychiatric clinic. There were four police officers there, three nurses, and a doctor, though she only arrived ten minutes later.
I asked to be allowed to sit down and was shown to a bench. Then I asked to have the handcuffs taken off, since it was actually I who had requested police protection. But instead, I was thrown to the floor again, having my head hurled onto the stone floor from a metre (3 ft) height, which nobody reacted to. Then they asked me whether I wanted a face mask, which of course I declined.
It should be noted that the police offered a different perspective and stated.
Because I refused to move, they physically carried me to the doctor, who asked me "why I felt threatened", even though they all know perfectly well who I am. I was told I would not be given a lawyer. Source
Following protests Bahner was released on the 15th of Arpril and released the below statement.
The woman encountered by the patrol responding to the call “gave a very confused impression,” prompting the cops to take her to a clinic. “She fought back and kicked an officer several times,” a police spokesman told German media, adding that Bahner was eventually admitted to Heidelberg University Hospital. Source
Whilst the authorities might be quick to label all that oppose them as paranoid, a cursory glance at the spy grid and military apparatus they're are assembling around us will reveal that they're the most observably paranoid of us all! Time to send for the men in white coats??
Beate Bahner requires no legal representation, since practically the whole legal profession and the whole judicial system has utterly failed in the past two weeks, thereby contributing to the abolition of the rule of law and the lightning-quick setting-up of the most monstrous and appalling régime of injustice that the world has ever seen. Source
Controlling The Narrative
I believe that they’re going to attempt to exponentially increase the negative connotations around and blur the lines between conspiracy theory and the independent researcher. One day anyone that opposes the official narrative will be a conspiracy theorist, and from there they can build mental health, hate, and terror equations. It is also my belief that within multiple areas of our lives that we are being nudged towards a long planned A.I enabled technocratic scientific/psychiatric control system that seeks to relay singular black and white answers to a world of a million shades of grey.
Riddled with dogma and statistical manipulation, scientism that has more in common with religious fervour and the cult of personality than the true scientific method. If you doubt the direction they want to take this in, I urge all readers to take a look at my two part mental health article that is linked at the bottom of this post. I have also included my social media post that details how these methodologies are now stalking the halls of cyberspace.