(continued from Part 6a)
The Rockefeller (and Gates) Crystal Ball
It's amazing how well the Rockefellers and Gates can predict the future - particularly with regards to Global Pandemics.
With Gates, it was just this past fall (in October of 2019) where there was a simulation of a coronavirus spreading around the world - only difference is that it originated in Brazil from a pig (instead of China with a Bat/Pangolin). The simulation was called Event 201 (click the link to visit the official website).
And, needless to say when you read and watch the simulation, you will see that it is eerily close to what is currently happening with the COVID-19 Global Pandemic.
What a coincidence.
As stated in the official website's Players page, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is front and center of this simulation both with regards to its funding and its response. Surprise, surprise.
Moreover, you can already see how Gates was postering and positioning for the "desired response"; specifically, you can have a look at their Public-private cooperation for pandemic preparedness and response - Call to Action page which issues a bunch of Recommendations that includes the following [Emphasis added]:
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose the following:
Industry, national governments, and international organizations should work together to enhance internationally held stockpiles of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to enable rapid and equitable distribution during a severe pandemic.
The World Health Organization (WHO)...with contracts in place with pharmaceutical companies that have agreed to supply vaccines should WHO request them.
As one possible approach, this virtual stockpile model could be expanded to augment WHO’s ability to distribute vaccines and therapeutics to countries in the greatest need during a severe pandemic.
This should also include any available experimental vaccine stockpiles for any WHO R&D Blueprint pathogens to deploy in a clinical trial during outbreaks in collaboration with CEPI, GAVI, and WHO.
...Countries with national supplies or domestic manufacturing capabilities should commit to donating some supply/product to this virtual stockpile. Countries should support this effort through the provision of additional funding.
See how this is already taking place today?
Gates & Co. were already positioning themselves for stockpiling of vaccines - even experimental ones (who cares about safety anyway, eh?) and practically strong-arming governments to foot the bill so he and his Gavi & Big-Pharma buddies can benefit greatly. How wonderful.
Independent researcher and investigative journalist Spiro Skouras has created several articles and videos on the subject, including one entitled Did Bill Gates & World Economic Forum Predict Coronavirus Outbreak? An Inside Look May Shock You! (click here for related video) and you can watch it hereunder:
Skouras also produced a highly-relevant piece entitled The U.N. & Central Banks: A Rockefeller & Rothschild Coup which also puts the plans of the Rockefeller (and other faux-philanthropists) in a larger context - one in which a new digitally-based monetary system is currently in the works to replace the current dying fiat based one. I highly recommend that the reader have a look at this one, particularly starting from the 9:02 mark where he goes through the history of how the Rockefeller's spearheaded the United Nations (under which the WHO currently falls under) and how it is used to push nefarious agendas.
But Rockefeller's Crystal Ball is much more powerful, or at least forward-looking I should say.
As his goes back much further to 2010.
Specifically, I am referring to a document entitled ‘Rockefeller Foundation: Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’ that was originally published in 2010 which foresaw a global pandemic occurring eerily similar to what is happening this year.
On page 18 under the header 'LOCK STEP: A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback' you can find the following text (I've highlighted the particularly precognitive sections):
And, allow me to cite these relevant parts hereunder in case they are difficult to read on the image above:
The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery.
If that is not creepy as hell, then I don't know what is.
These predictions were 100% spot-on accurate.
How could that be?
Even war simulations and scenarios planning prepared by the Pentagon and miltirary organizations have yet to predict something with as much accuracy as has the Rockefeller Foundation with this particular exercise.
I am not the type to believe in such coincidences.
So, needless to say, I think it is best to lean on the cautious side of things with regards to these "foreshadowings".
Rockefeller 'National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan': - A Digital Medical Tyranny, forced Tracking, and Vaccinations
I congratulate the reader if s/he has made it this far in this part, for what comes next will really show you what the decades of "hard work" of the Rockefellers and their accomplices ultimately have in store for us.
One month ago (on April 21, 2020), the Rockefeller Foundation issued a white paper titled “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities.”
Image taken from cover of the white paper document (PDF)
The document is 29 pages in length and in lieu of highlighting the important and relevant parts page by page which I think it would prove confusing to the reader, rather, I prefer to present citations from the Plan (document) in what I would categorize as the following MAJOR OBJECTIVES of this plan, at least as I see and interpret it. Accordingly, I will feature these important citations in the following 4 areas:
1. Profit motive: Positioning their Corporate Partners (Testing & Vaccine manufacturers)
2. Tagging & Tracking motive
3. Centralizing Medical Records (of all citizens)
4. Creating a Response & Enforcement Arm
Please note that I am adding emphasis to certain words and phrases from the original text.
I will also add my assessment and interpretation of these key passages under each relevant section.
1. Profit motive: Positioning their Corporate Partners (Testing & Vaccine manufacturers)
Perhaps the main arc or theme that is somewhat omnipresent in this Plan is that of Testing (for COVID-19 now, but perhaps for others later on).
The Foreward (on p. 2) to the plan, written by the President of the Rockefeller Foundation, Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, includes the following from the introductory paragraphs:
(p. 2) In the face of an ineffective nationally-coordinated response, insufficient data, and inadequate amounts of protective gear and testing, we need an exit plan.
(p. 2) Testing is our way out of this crisis.
Hence, the tone of the plan is laid bare right off the bat. He continues:
(p. 2) Our National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan lays out the precise steps necessary to enact robust testing, tracing, and coordination to more safely reopen our economy – starting with a dramatic expansion of testing from 1 million tests per week to initially 3 million per week and then 30 million per week, ...
(p. 4) The goal of the Action Plan is to build a state-led national program of Covid-19 testing that supports reopening the economy through the goals of workforce monitoring, early detection of recurrent outbreaks, and diagnostic and home testing.
(p. 6) The number of tests needed to successfully prevent recurrent outbreaks while allowing some relaxation
of social distancing will depend on the vigilance of contact tracing. With the kind of high-precision contact tracing used in South Korea, just 2.5 to 5 million tests per day would be required.
(p. 8) The effort will ultimately grow to billions of dollars per month although innovations in testing technology should eventually drop costs.
(p. 12) According to some epidemiological analyses, halting the epidemic entirely while allowing nearly everyone to return to work requires testing between 20 million and 30 million people daily.
(p. 22) Fully controlling the Covid-19 epidemic requires that we test the majority of the population weekly.
Firstly, note that by 'testing' the document specifies not one, but two kinds of tests:
- a molecular SARS-CoV-2 test for the infection itself; and
- a separate serological blood test to detect antibodies.
In short, according to this report, the number of tests that would be administered ranges in the astounding range of 30 million per week up to 30 million each and every day!
Moreover, they even state that they would test the majority of the population weekly basis. And according to their own rough estimates, these would cost in the "billions of dollars per month".
Thus, one can easily see the tremendous profit motive derived from this plan.
And who would most likely stand to benefit from mass producing and selling these test kits? Though it is not specifically mentioned in this document, it is safe to assume that their "key" partners would most likely firms in which they have financial positions or share ownership in.
2. Tagging & Tracking motive
(p. 6) Digital apps and privacy-protected tracking software should be widely adopted to enable more complete contact tracing.
I probably don't need to introduce the concept of contact tracing to the user. But, it essentially means tracking all the people you have been in contact (or in proximity) with via "digital apps" (i.e., your smartphone).
(p. 6) Whenever possible, incentives should be used to nudge the voluntary use of these apps rather than require them.
Funny how they use the term "nudge". For some reason, the image that pops into my mind is the proverbial, Orwellian 'Boot stamping on your face' kind. But, this nudging would only be reserved for those pesky non-conformists, otherwise you can simply willfully submit.
(p. 20) There is a need to develop a real-time common data-sharing platform to better understand available testing capacity.
Here, the key term is real-time which means they would have the ability track and locate you in 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
(p. 20) The integration of diverse data sets from public health systems, social media, and mobility data into a shared platform with open-source modeling tool development and appropriate security and compliance controls will accelerate the experimentation and development of prediction algorithms that power the monitoring and decision-making components of the digital platform.
This part sounds pretty scary, as "integrating" your personal, medical, mobile/smartphone, and private data all at once from a single source is beyond comprehension. This level of overreach on anyone's personal information is just to egregious to imagine.
(p. 21) Companies like Apple and Google are leading the way by engaging directly with privacy advocates, allowing individuals to opt-in to new tools,... Apple and Google are working on a contact-tracing app to alert people – on an opt-in basis – if they’ve been in touch with someone known to have the novel coronavirus. An active symptom-checker app is in development.
Two red flags here folks. First, Apple and Google - particularly the latter - don't exactly have a respectable record with regards to user privacy, as numerous data breaches have occurred in the last several years.
Secondly, it is stated that their contact-tracing app (which has already been in development for months, I must add) would work on a "opt-in" basis. But we all know that even if you opt-out they always find a way to screw you - either by changing their policies (you know the ones where you click "Ok" so you can proceed with your life) or simply ignoring your directive and blatantly disrespecting it (as they have done on countless occasions in the past). It's a lose-lose situation folks.
(p. 21) Apple and Google have announced a joint effort to bolster contact tracing by building software into smartphones that relies on Bluetooth technology to track users’ proximity to one another. Facebook is participating in a similar effort led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ditto for Facebook x 10, as we all know that Facebook is even more careless in this regard (case in point: Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal)
3. Centralizing Medical Records (of all citizens)
(p. 6) A national system to track Covid-19 status must be created.
(p. 6) At least 100,000 people and perhaps as many as 300,000 must be hired to undertake a vigorous campaign of test administration and contact tracing, and they must be supported by computer systems networked with regional and national viral datasets and as many electronic health records from local hospital systems as can be provided.
A "national viral dataset". I believe what they mean by this is a centralized/national database of the "infected". We also have to keep in mind that once such a database is commenced, there will be no turning back. If COVID-19 dies out what other diseases or medical conditions will they "track" in such a database? Where is the limit? Who decides?
(p. 6) Policy makers and the public must find the balance between privacy concerns and infection control to allow the infection status of most Americans to be accessed and validated in a few required settings and many voluntary ones.
This is codeword for we will lobby/bribe/coerce/brownstone any politician we want to support and vote for any legislation that will be drawn up to take away yet more privacy rights away from you. Funny how they use "and validated in a few required settings" - what exactly does that mean? Simple enough to deduce: by force. I really just can't believe their choice of words sometimes.
(pp. 17-18) Those screened must be given a unique patient identification number that would link to information
about a patient’s viral, antibody and eventually vaccine status under a system that could easily handshake with other systems to speed the return of normal societal functions.
I think THIS IS THE ABSOLUTE MOST SCARIEST PASSAGE in the entire National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan document.
A "unique patient identification number" - one could easily see how this "ID number" can be used not only for health reasons, but also for a person's right and freedom to participate in "societal functions", as they put it. More on that in a second...
But first, they are implying that a "patient" would be databased with 3 important identifiers: viral status + antibody status, and vaccine status.
We know they want to test you for the first two.
As for the latter, the vaccine, it is not beyond suspicion that they would use this (vaccination) as very powerful leverage over people. In other words, while they may not force you to take the vaccination, they could easily and surely make your life a living hell should you decide to "opt-out" of having that syringe stabbed into your body (with God knows what in it).
Don't think this could happen? Then, why would they state "but also for a person's right and freedom to participate in "societal functions"? It is clearly delineated in the document that such "societal functions" would include and not be limited to being able to access: schools, business/buildings/workplaces, travel (by plane, train, subway, etc.), venues (such as cinemas, concerts, sporting events, and the like). The same would likely be the case for receiving governmental benefits, pensions, obtaining a driver's license. And so on.
It would be quite easy for them to justify the denial of these functions/services to anyone deemed "infected" or "potentially infected" all in the name of keeping everyone else "safe".
(p. 18) Schools could link this to attendance lists, large office buildings to employee ID cards, TSA to passenger lists and concert and sports venues to ticket purchasers.
(p. 18) This infection database must easily interoperate with doctor, hospital and insurance health records in an essential and urgent national program to finally rationalize the disparate and sometimes deliberately isolated electronic medical records systems across the country.
(p. 18) On March 9, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released two long-awaited final rules that would prohibit information blocking in health care and advance more seamless exchange of health care data. But publication in the Federal Register, necessary to activate the rules, has been inexplicably delayed. This delay must end.
4. Creating a Response & Enforcement Arm
(p. 2) The plan also includes: launching a Covid Community Healthcare Corps so every American can easily get tested...and a Pandemic Testing Board, ...
(p. 2) Enacting it will require strong leadership and collaboration: across states, cities, and federal government, and from businesses, nonprofits, universities, community groups, and individuals.
(p. 8) Coordination of such a massive program should be treated as a wartime effort, with a public/private bipartisan Pandemic Testing Board established to assist and serve as a bridge between local, state, and federal officials with the logistical, investment and political challenges this operation will inevitably face.
A "wartime effort". Where have we heard that kind of rhetoric before? Oh year, WWI, WWII, 9/11, Gulf War, and so on. This is the same kind of posturing to get the masses on board as has previously been done.
Remember that the USA Patriot Act - the single most destructive act of Congress when it comes to stripping away rights and freedoms of Americans - was written before the events of 9/11. But since good-hearted Americans widely accepted the new "Fight on Terrorism", it can now be paralleled that we are facing yet another formidable, this time invisible enemy. So, we must all band together.
See how the deception works folks? Rinse and repeat. Different crisis, same tactic.
(p. 17) Rapidly hire an additional 100,000 to 300,000 people using existing hiring authorities: ...needed to provide all essential services...The Corporation for National and Community Service, the federal agency that oversees Americorps,
the Senior Corps and the Volunteer Generation Fund, could be used. The National Guard can fill gaps, and nonprofits
can provide volunteers.
Notice "National Guard" can help fill the gap here. They really mean that should volunteer groups prove inadequate, then these armed forces could be mobilized to accomplish matters in a more forceful and intimidating manner.
(p. 17) Some privacy concerns must be set aside for an infectious agent as virulent as Covid-19, allowing the infection status of most Americans to be accessed and validated in a few required settings and many voluntary ones.
(p. 17) But vaccine development and manufacture could take years, and when it comes certain populations may be
excluded from receiving it for health reasons. In the meantime, infection status must be known for people to participate in many societal functions.
(p. 19) The Rockefeller Foundation’s Equity and Economic Opportunity and Health Initiatives is piloting a Community Health Workers Corps (CHW’s) in Baltimore. Investing in the launch of a health workers corps would allow every community to not only have testing and contact tracing capability but also have a “social distancing/public health workforce.” CHW’s could undertake everything from sanitizing spaces to enforcing separation to spraying sanitizer on people’s hands regularly, particularly where crowds gather. Pending some approvals, the target launch is June 1, 2020.
Notice how they always tend to pilot these programs in poor and under-privileged areas, as they do with vaccines in third-world countries (and as I will further demonstrate in Part 7 'ID2020 under COVID-19' of this series). People from these spots tend to be more vulnerable and weaker and will usually offer less resistance. It's quite disgusting how they prey and target these vulnerable souls.
(p. 18) Similarly, The Rockefeller Foundation has been working with The Community Organized Relief Effort (CORE) in Los Angeles to scale up testing in LA County, statewide, and ultimately nationwide through the training of volunteers to administer tests and record results.
Another pilot city - Los Angeles. But, here notice how they then append statewide, and ultimately nationwide meaning their intention is to roll this out across the country. They always test out these things in pilot cities first to assess the level of resistance they get. If they get a low or manageable level of resistance, then they usually proceed in larger fashion.
(APPENDIX: Proposal for a Pandemic Testing Board, pp. 27-28) While stay-at-home orders are working to slow the spread of the coronavirus, the reopening of the economy and society could be achieved more safely and more swiftly under the following conditions:
(1) deployment of a vaccine, which is projected to take 12-18 months, in which time there will be significant costs to the economy and harm to the social wellbeing of individuals and communities, or
(2) a regime of almost universal testing. Widespread testing for both presence of the virus and for antibodies – in the order of millions of tests per day will enable those who have antibodies or are not infected to re-enter the economy. It will also make it possible to quarantine only those who have been infected or who have been in contact with the infected,
I've covered these troubling points a bit earlier; so, for the sake of brievity I won't repeat myself.
(APPENDIX:) Further, travel and commerce will not truly be able to reopen unless there is sufficient global production and deployment of tests and ultimately vaccines.
My question here is: Who gave them the authority to decide whether travel and commerce can reopen? And notice the important word here - "global" - which indicates that their intention with this plan is to ultimately have it beyond the borders of the United States to the world at large. Quite ambitious, wouldn't you say?
(APPENDIX:) We therefore propose the creation of a Pandemic Testing Board (PTB), akin to the War Production Board that the United States created in World War II, in order to massively scale up production and deployment of testing.
(APPENDIX:) and would be tasked with two projects:
(1) Pandemic Testing Supply Initiative. ...and the power to mandate production or services, akin to authorities in the Defense Production Act.
(2) Pandemic Testing Deployment Initiative. In order to deploy testing at scale, there will need to be sufficient personnel to test individuals outside of hospitals and doctors’ offices. The PTB would:
- Craft recommendations for states to use the national guard to deploy testing in conjunction with business, labor, nonprofits, and academia.
- If necessary, be authorized to create a Pandemic Response Corps
So, in the 'Proposal for a Pandemic Testing Board' (pp. 27-28 of the document) they are proposing the formation of what would be an extremely powerful entity that would have powers that, in essence, can only be understood as a form of MEDICAL TYRANNY.
The first project - 'Pandemic Testing Supply Initiative' would enjoy the power of 'mandating services' related to the testing (of people for the virus and antibodies). In other words, they really mean to force this "service" on unwilling participants when deemed necessary. This assertion of mine is further substantiated by the fact that they directly state "akin to authorities in the Defense Production Act". Akin means like. And the Defense Production Act is a wartime-like act that enables a country and its leadership to suspend existing laws all in the name of "national security", similar to Martial Law. The act has recently been put into effect by President Trump in the context of COVID-19.
Their second project - 'Pandemic Testing Deployment Initiative' is pretty much as stated. The choice of words - deployment - is quite clear and telling, just as when you deploy troops for battle/war. Once again, they refer to the possible use of the National Guard for such enforcement.
(APPENDIX:) The Pandemic Testing Board could be designed in one of two ways:
- Nationalist Model: The board would consist of no more than 9 members, chosen either by the President or the director of the NIAID,
- Federalist Model: Congress would pass a law authorizing the states to create an interstate compact. The lead states would select a board of no more than 9 members
Here, the first key think to note is that there would be only 9 members on this very powerful board. Only 9 members could impose their will on hundreds of millions of citizens. Seems fair.
Next, we can see that they are positioning themselves with two options: a "Nationalist" one and a "Federalist" one. I think that what they are getting at is if President Trump goes along with their plan, it will be all copacetic. But if he is against it, they will go their usual way - by co-opting Congress to do their bidding.
And notice how they say the "lead states" would select the board members. As we know, by "lead states" they are referring to those who would most likely go along with the plan, namely the "blue" or Democratic states as can be easily observed since these are the states that are currently imposing the harshest lockdowns in the country (in contrast with the "red", or Republican states).
(APPENDIX:) Appropriations: We recommend Congress appropriate sufficient resources to fund the Board and massively scaled up testing production and deployment.
(APPENDIX:) Author info: [4 authors in all including] E. Glen Weyl, RadicalxChange Foundation, Microsoft Office of the Chief Technology Officer
The last point I want to make with regards to the document itself is that one of the four authors of this 'Proposal for a Pandemic Testing Board' includes a fellow named E. Glen Weyl. Upon further scrutiny, we can see that Mr. Weyl is the CTO Political Economist & Social Technologist for Microsoft and founder and chairman of the RadicalXChange Foundation that is also pushing an almost identical plan (called “Roadmap to Pandemic Resilience: Massive Scale Testing, Tracing, and Supported Isolation (TTSI) as the Path to Pandemic Resilience for a Free Society,”) to that of the Rockefeller Foundation.
The fact that he is a higher-up at Microsoft leads me to suspect that it would be this company, of course Bill Gates' puppy, that would be mandated in developing this greater system of a centralized database for testing and health repository for COVID-19.
In other words, Microsoft, Bill Gates, Gavi, Big Pharma, and their buddies would likely all have access to the private health data of all the citizens found therein.
Doesn't that sound re-assuring?
Just imagine how this private health data could be compromised and used for egregious endeavors.
To conclude this lengthy, but highly important part of this exposé, I would just like to emphasize that we should not underestimate the power and reach of the Rockefeller Foundation, its partners, and the influence they have over nations' political and governmental circles.
They are much more "covert" than the Bill Gates'es and thus would appear benign to the average citizen. Yet, the power their yield over the lives of billions of people on this planet is (and has been for over a century) tremendous and not to be belittled.
Like a nearly invisible virus and disease such as COVID-19, the biggest threats are usually the ones we can't see.
Note that I am not personally pro- or anti-vaccine; I am for truth and honesty in their development, testing, distribution, and supervision - all of which, currently, are grossly lacking, as will be extensively documented and demonstrated in the upcoming parts.
Once completed, I intend to put everything together in a single PDF downloadable file for easier sharing and distribution.
Comments and re-steems are more than welcome!
In Peace & Liberty,