If no scientific analysis of supposed "gender dysphoria" is allowed, do we need psychiatrists AT ALL, anymore?

5개월 전

This is sick and twisted. Breitbart is reporting that leaks from the world of the psychobabblers are confirming that no questioning of a child's or parent's claim of suspected gender dysphoria by psychiatric professionals is now even permitted, in order to ascertain if genital mutilation and gender inappropriate drugs should be employed on the subject in question, or not.


(Image courtesy of openpr.com.)

Check out the link below:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/16/liberal-feminist-mother-warns-transgender-activists-are-taking-control-of-mental-health-profession/

Here is a key excerpt:

"A liberal feminist mother of a gender-dysphoric teen warns parents that transgender activists are ensuring it will soon be 'nearly impossible' to find a mental health professional who is willing to help these children evaluate their self-perceptions.

'I quickly discovered that it is nearly impossible to find therapists who do this kind of work,' wrote the anonymous mother in a piece that appeared at the Federalist Tuesday. 'If a girl presents as transgender today, the vast majority of therapists will immediately affirm the girl’s declared gender identity and ask her what steps she would like to take toward transition.'

Currently, transgender activists are celebrating their success in pressing lawmakers in 16 states and the District of Columbia to ban what they call 'conversion therapy.' These political supporters of gender ideology claim therapists who do not immediately affirm the perception of young people claiming to be a gender that is incompatible with their biological sex are 'harmful' and 'abusive' and must be outlawed."


(Image courtesy of plasticurgeryhub.au.com.)

So, in other words, what do we need these psychiatrists for at all, if all they are doing is rubber stamping the (probably implanted) "feelings" of young children or equally confused adults? It is estimated by some conservative watchdogs that more than half of those receiving "conversion therapy," up to and including gender manipulation or surgery, are later determined BY THE SUBJECT and/or others to have been the victim of false assumptions and liberal propaganda.

Of course, by then, some of the worst effects of LBGT activism are physical irreversible, as is much of the psychological damage resulting from false reassignment. Then, of course, these same people might actually "need" these same psychiatrists to overcome the worst aspects of their previous lack of involvement and legitimate assessment.

The LBGT community, of course, can not naturally procreate, so all their activism is centered around RECRUITMENT, and once recruited into such dystopian lifestyles, these activists do not want any of their victims transitioning back to a normal life. Here is one additional excerpt from the article cited above:

"Heyer, as the Christian Post reported, lived as a transgender woman for eight years and underwent surgery in 1983. In his discussion, he labeled what transgender activists are doing to young people today – controlling mental health therapy and pushing hormonal treatments and surgical interventions – as 'abuse.'

'That is child abuse,' Heyer said. 'We need to be calling it what it is. It’s not affirming a child. It’s causing them to be depressed and anxious about who they are.'

'The only reason I am able to speak to you today is because after 46 years dealing with this issue, I was able to de-transition in 1990 after I had psychotherapy, the very same psychotherapy [transgender activists] are trying to prevent people from having,' he explained. 'Why? Because they don’t want them to de-transition'."


(Courtesy of ovacc.au.com.)

So, I have to ask the obvious....is the goal of the "transgendered" community really to do what is best for confused young people--even small children--or is about "misery loving company" and trying to build their still infinitesimally small numbers to a societally acceptable level of public clout and significance?

You decide.

I will just give you one clue...If banning the discussion of a person's real likelihood of being gender dysphoric is a "great victory" for the LGBT community, then I will let you figure out what the real agenda is behind it.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

It is a dangerous world. Nothing in it is more dangerous than psychotics... I mean psychologists. If their prognostications regarding this matter are necessarily unchallengable by law, then they have acquired the power of involuntary commitment to a course of treatment. On this issue particularly, that is a terrible threat to people. Imagine being reported by a malevolent neighbor as someone who should not be allowed firearms under Red Flag laws, and having an unfriendly visit from local constabulary, where they seize your weapons. Seeking redress of your grievances, you file suit, and the state recruits an expert psychological witness - as they surely will in such cases going forward, that are going to involve litigation involving any survivors of the seizure events - who testifies that you are suffering from gender dysphoria and are repressing as a result of denial.

Whack! The gavel comes down, and you are sentenced to the care of that psychologist for 72 hours. You are seized and taken to some medieval torture palace, drugged into insensibility and pass out. When you awake, and find you are surgically altered, your neighbor whose malevolence got you into this mess to begin with, is no longer relevant to your concerns, which are going to be surviving the outrage at having been involuntarily gender swapped, or maybe staring at your naked body in a mirror aghast.

While this may seem ludicrous and impossible, I actually do not think it is. If things don't change, I expect exactly this to become an effective threat to silence dissent. A few examples of regendered dissidents, and but few would dare to dissent, publicly.

"The LBGT community, of course, can naturally procreate..."

Pretty sure they can't. Perhaps there's a word missing in your post?

Thanks!

·

Yep, you nailed, as usual my friend. We are giving these atheistic witch doctors carte blanche to mess with people's lives in any way they choose. Traditional thought, or even belief in unpopular religious may also soon be proscribed as "insanity."

Yep..."not" procreate. Fixing now.