Why 'Fear About Globalisation' Is A Misdirection From Important Aspects of Reality: The Hypocrisy & Blatant Manipulation of The Facts of Alex Jones' Infowars

4년 전

In reading this post from @kennyskitchen recently, I learned how Alex Jones' media outfit 'infowars' had published an absurdly misleading and nonsensical piece about veganism - all but blaming vegans for everything under the sun.. I am surprised we weren't blamed for 911 and spread of Malaria in Africa... Generally, the point was made that veganism is some kind of 'globalist plot' or at least supports 'the globalists'.. I can't resist replying to this.

The basic claim here is that veganism (the non exploitation of living beings and thus the non eating of dead animals and non use of their secretions) requires plant based goods to be transported globally to get around seasonal growth patterns. The claim is then also that this 'feeds in' to a 'threat' of a 'one world government' whereby people will be 'deceived' into wanting to be vegan then will support/promote a one world government to somehow sustain their plant based diets. LOL. If I have misunderstood this, please correct me.

There are so many points and issues here I am not sure where to start.

Firstly, the Earth IS ONE planet. The artificial division into districts is entirely fictional and only exists within the minds of those who believe in it and enforce it. There are many who prefer not to have any boundaries at all - yet these 'patriots' often deny that by forcing boundaries on others, THEY are overpowering others in exactly the kind of way that they fear 'globalists' will do through setting up a government that 'rules the world'.

The fear they are being driven by is that of a centralisation of power such that the majority have no power and the tiny few have it all. They think that this requires a 'one world government' - when in reality we are quite close to this situation already - without a one world government. The problem is NOT and has NEVER been 'one world', since 'one world' is the natural state anyway. The problem is hierarchic domination, overpowering and a centralisation of power. The problem is IMBALANCE.

As long as people are out of balance, the door is open for loss of power, loss of freedom and loss of life. What is being missed here is that forcing death and destruction on the animals of the planet is a form of imbalance. We cannot continue in a state of imbalance and expect imbalance in other forms to end. Everything is connected.

The mass murder industry known as 'meat and dairy' is A DIRECT REFLECTION of the kind of structure that the 'new world order' represents - it basically IS part of their system. Only those who are indoctrinated and still stuck in one of their thought prisons would fail to see this. We cannot solve problems from the same level of consciousness at which they were created - this is a given. Look for a moment at how 'the problem of nutrition' is being 'solved' through a death, torture and exploitation machine in almost exactly the same way that 'the problem of personal power loss' is being 'solved' by the 'new world order's 'war, death, drugs, oil and gold' machine. The systems are almost identical energetically, the main difference is that animals are the victims of the meat/dairy machine and humans are the victims of the war/politics machine.

Given that this is the case and having had countless debates and discussions with others where I have heard just about every possible justification for support of the death machines - I am confident that no evidence can be provided to rebutt this that cannot be countered honestly and completely.

Given that this is the case, the only remaining issue here is that of how to live as a vegan without relying on suppliers of food in remote locations to bypass the issue of the changing of the seasons. This is a good question. If we live near the equator, this becomes less of an issue and in tropical climates our lives become significantly easier when it comes to locating fresh, nutritious plant foods. Perhaps much of the answer is in those who inhabit the colder climates relocating to a more intelligent area instead of vampiring on the creatures who are more adapted to live on the plants there already.

Beyond this we can obviously use technology to grow plants all year around in any location now - with minimal transport and trade globally.

Is there really a requirement for us to be able to eat foods grown locally though? While I agree it is an ideal - we don't tend to hear Alex Jones complaining about how all of his studio technology was imported and how Asian technology corporations are part of a globalist agenda, do we? How about the internet? Sounds like another globalist plot to me. lol.

The fact here is that Infowars has blatantly and foolishly manipulated and twisted the truth like some kind of greedy and paranoid fantasy machine - which is sad to me since in the early days I feel they put out some good documentaries on important topics. But hey, maybe I'm wrong and maybe Alex will stop shipping his range of supplements and tangy tangerine internationally to avoid feeding in to the agenda he claims to oppose.

Here's the video Kenny Highlighted:

Wishing you well,

Ura Soul

Vote @ura-soul for Steem Witness!


vote ura-soul for witness

View My Witness Application Here


(Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Steem Blockchain.
Without witnesses there is no Steem, Steemit, DTube, Utopian or
Busy... You can really help Steem by making your 30 witness votes count!
Don't forget, there are more than the 50 witnesses you see on the witness voting page in steemit.com)


steem ocean - diving deep into the blockchain

Find out your voter rank position at steemocean.com!


ureka.org

I run a social network too!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

Just wow... so now refusing to partake of dead animal bodies makes you implicit and complicit in the globalist agenda. Alex Jones is turning into a sitdown comedian more than a truth exposer.

·

It does the quest for truth no favours to have such a loud mouthpiece be so distorted. :/

Mostly what is happening is a bunch of liars are profiting from there lie's. You ought to check out sun gazing. I didn't believe it at first, but have had trouble seeing things close up. I fixed this sun gazing. It also has caused me to loose a lot of weight and the Diabetes has been receding. I take less than half the shots I use to have to take and am looking forward to not needing the poison the med's actually are.

Nice post exposing the liar's.

·

Very good! I am aware of sungazing, yes - and have heard very good things too. I feel part of its excellent effects are due to standing bare foot and being grounded. I did do it here for a while, but I am not a morning person and we don't really get good sun exposure here enough to motivate me. I would be interested to hear more of your experiences.

·
·

One can Sun Gaze at Sunset, which is when I usually do it. It is OK to sun gaze any time there is no UV rays. I will tell that as a meditate r I was shocked to discover that Sun gazing causes third eye to activate. I have been meditating for about 5 years now and have waking theta brain wave activity. This also happens during sun gazing. I may write a post about it sometime, however seeing as I don't know anyone else doing it and have discovered that most people merely put you in the nut category : I don't usually talk about it.

I liked your post because it highlights that the facts in reality do not support the claims being made about vegans. I know that vegan's could include a mild practice of Sun Gazing that would improve there health. That is why I mentioned sun gazing.

·
·
·

Thankyou, yes. You m ight find the documentary 'In the beginning there was light" interesting if you haven't already seen it. I don't think it is available anywhere for free though only a trailer on youtube.

The advice I have received regarding sungazing is to do it both in the morning and evening - but yes, you are right, doing it in the evening alone is probably better than not doing it at all.

·
·
·
·

I just checked out that trailer, thanks for mentioning it. You where right I am interested. Learned something knew and I share that with you below.

"In Collier’s Weekly, February 9, 1901 Nicola Tesla one of history’s most brilliant minds and prolific inventors wrote “Why should a living being not be able to obtain all the energy it needs for the performance of its life functions from the environment, instead of through consumption of food?“"

https://lightdocumentary.space/2016/03/18/how-breatharianism-works-the-science-of-light-and-water/

Thanks!

·
·
·
·
·

You are welcome! I hadn't seen that page before - It was good to read and I am inspired again to explore it more personally. :)

Most meat is distributed internationally, especially beef which is often supplied to Asian countries out of North America. Not sure if you could make the process of obtaining energy from food any more complicated and inefficient.

Good call to bring clarity. Too many of the big posting online "stars" (using that word loosely) seem to lose perspective and become judgmental. Thank you for this battle in the infowars saga. :)

Without an enemy to fear the state loses its job.

Without a conspiracy to fear Alex Jones loses his job.

They both profit through the perpetuation of fear, anger, and conflict.

Posted using Partiko Android

·

Absolutely, yes - Alex attacks the war on terror while causing some of his own!

Given the damage meat production is doing to the planet I'd have thought they would approve of giving it up, or do they not care what state the planet is in? I care more about the environment than politics and big business.

·

I am not sure they really care much at all. They appear to be largely just capitalising on fear and ignorance.. Exactly the modus operandi of those they claim to oppose!

Does infowars really deserve a response to the garbage they deliver? Nevertheless, well written, as always @ura-soul.

·

Maybe not, but when big budget 'TV' shows go unchallenged, a percentage of impressionable people tend to go along with it. Not that I think they will read my blog, but someone might benefit!

"The systems are almost identical energetically, the main difference is that animals are the victims of the meat/dairy machine and humans are the victims of the war/politics machine."

Great quote!

·

Your post is hard to respond to, because it is really all over the place.

Alex Jones loves to come up with conspiracy theories. Some are better than others.

If transportation was halted for some reason, vegans, and even vegetarians would just die. (or change their diet.)

Your ideas on borders are VERY incorrect.
You do not allow just anyone to walk into your house or yard.
Similarly, you do not let just anyone into your community, if your community is self sufficient.

Only with our huge transportation grid can we allow people to move fairly freely about. Because, when they move, a few at a time, the transportation grid can bring them food wherever they are.

To illustrate this, lets say SHTF happens, and you are in your bunker/home with enough food for a year. And some hungry children show up at your door. If you feed them, you will not survive a year. What do you do?

So, borders are VERY important. Especially at the personal level, and get blurrier as you expand outward. National borders are very important because of the welfare state. All of those refugees we allow in cost each of us enormously.


Globablism will not get rid of borders, in fact, it will probably create even harsher borders. Where you will have to file for movement papers to move between counties.

Globalism is about control. You should see what China is doing moving people around and controlling their movement.


Yes, you have a proper beef with the current factory livestock practices and conditions.

However, you are not taking into account the death and destruction of current farming practices and conditions.

Veganism is not better for the planet. If everyone went vegan, or even vegetarian, half the world would starve. We don't have enough arable farm land. Grassland feeds cattle feeds humans. Grassland is not arable farm land.


So, we are left with the absolute bottom line. Your eating style requires a global shipping network to continue. And thus, you will support just about anything to keep that network going. And that is a lever that the globalists can use.

My response to veganism / vegetarian.
https://steemit.com/istilleatmeat/@builderofcastles/convince-me-challenge-why-you-should-eat-meat-accepted

And i suggest you build an in-earth-greenhouse and grow most of your own food.
https://steemit.com/gardening/@builderofcastles/earth-sheltered-solar-greenhouse-year-around-food-out-of-recycled-materials

·

Your post is hard to respond to, because it is really all over the place.

I am a bit ill here today and not feeling like going into massive detail on all of this - partially since I would only be repeating myself again. ;)

If transportation was halted for some reason, vegans, and even vegetarians would just die. (or change their diet.)

What is the evidence for that? Previous generations stored their produce over the winter. The animals somehow survive too - they eat plants. We are currently using the land just about as inefficiently as I can imagine.. I calculated earlier how much land would roughly be needed to feed the entire village I live in with a variety of plant based foods - it was basically an area the size of a couple of the larger farmer fields here. The farmer fields are currently filled with sugar beat used to fuel machines! How ironic!

You do not allow just anyone to walk into your house or yard.

Have you noticed you are speaking for me and totally denying that I can think differently? That is the attitude almost to a tee that makes borders APPEAR necessary. If you do not respect the thinking of others then it is going to cause friction, fear and conflict. Yes, there are people 'out there' who are out of balance and might cause problems - however, those who live holistically and who understand their points of attraction in the cosmos can work with that such that safe living is possible without walling off the parts we don't like. Gaza is a particularly evil reflection of the dysfunction you are advocating for.

Only with our huge transportation grid can we allow people to move fairly freely about.

Because, when they move, a few at a time, the transportation grid can bring them food wherever they are.

The solution to this is to live in balance with the planet such that we sow a food baring environment as was intended, rather than a death baring environment. The problem is not movement, the problem is the environmental destruction brought about by a lack of imagination and an over reliance on industrlialisation and getting out of personal responsibility.

To illustrate this, lets say SHTF happens, and you are in your bunker/home with enough food for a year. And some hungry children show up at your door. If you feed them, you will not survive a year. What do you do?

Same thing, work with the land - listen to your gut and the earth - you are not alone on this planet - you are guided - if you learn to listen instead of deny the message.

So, borders are VERY important. Especially at the personal level, and get blurrier as you expand outward. National borders are very important because of the welfare state. All of those refugees we allow in cost each of us enormously.

The more we learn to respect and live in love, the more we will feel safe wherever we are. We are currently living out some of the final periods of immense imbalance which has many feeling that there is no alternative - I know differently now. 'The welfare state' is just part of a confidence trick that has the richest giving the crumbs to others and having guilt speak in place of love such that people think they are being looked after.

Globablism will not get rid of borders, in fact, it will probably create even harsher borders. Where you will have to file for movement papers to move between counties.

I see 'globalism' as being one of many words that fear has twisted into something other than what it is. Just as the word 'sustainability' has beeen adopted by empire builders and controllers to attempt to give the impression that their form of control is sustainable. For me 'globalism' only really means (in it's untwisted form) - 'working together in harmony for peace' - one love.

Globalism is about control. You should see what China is doing moving people around and controlling their movement.

That is the unloving twist on things that takes healthy things and perverts them.

However, you are not taking into account the death and destruction of current farming practices and conditions.

I do not think you know what I am taking into account and what I am not.

Veganism is not better for the planet. If everyone went vegan, or even vegetarian, half the world would starve. We don't have enough arable farm land. Grassland feeds cattle feeds humans. Grassland is not arable farm land.

The amount of resources needed to produce animal food is dramatically higher than is needed to produce plant based foods. The fact that humans have ignored the fertility of the land and attempted to rely on synthetic chemicals that don't work for 50 years is not proof that no better options exist. I suggest researching the food soil web in conjunction with rockdust remineralisation and compost tea - if you haven't already. These methods make it possible to produce excellent crops in just a couple of years on land that was previously not fertile.

So, we are left with the absolute bottom line. Your eating style requires a global shipping network to continue. And thus, you will support just about anything to keep that network going. And that is a lever that the globalists can use.

I disagree entirely based on my own experience and intentions.

And i suggest you build an in-earth-greenhouse and grow most of your own food.

I already do grow a significant amount of food - at some point I will indeed move to a more equatorial region and produce food forests and other forms of growth with produce an abundance for those involved. :)

·
·

If you are going to redefine the term globalist and globalism, then you need to state that every time you use it.

Else, we cannot have a conversation.

I can understand how you would like to use globablism, but unfortunately, it is used to mean NWO plans for structured dominance of all life on the planet.

·
·
·

Sure, it's a bit like how 'healthcare' typically really means 'profiteering form the diseased'.

·
·

If you do not care who walks through your house or your yard, please describe to me your plans for handling people who are not good for you or your property.

A person with no personal boundaries is a very unbalanced person.

·
·
·

I did not mention having no personal boundaries. I am pointing to the right way to manifest personal will in a 3D space without anyone feeling pressured or denied. If I draw an imaginary circle around me and plant a flag and say 'this is mine' - maybe people will be ok with it. But what if I keep doing that in different places and the circles get bigger and bigger (which is what capitalism is designed to support)? Eventually, I will get in the way of other people - perhaps who literally need access to the land that I now claim to be mine.

Another approach is to recognise that we all have real needs and that sometimes it is in all of our best interests to share! Want to stop beggars approaching you or giving you a feeling that you will be robbed? Maybe the answer is to collectively agree to share a bit more and not be so hardcore with our control of one another's freedom.

The reality is that there are many people on Earth who hate just about everyone and relish the idea of blowing someone's head off with a gun because they stepped onto their land. I know some of these people. So the flipside to your question might be "If you don't care who gets to fence off our world and shoot you when you disagree - please described to me your plans for getting the resources you need when they do this".

To directly answer your question - everyone has needs and desires. Many of us are so out of balance that we don't really know what our real needs are and so we are acting unconsciously - usually involving habits and other dysfunctional patterns. Along with the desire comes intentions - underneath. If the intention of a person is to do harm, they will do it whether they are on 'my' land or not. By having them on 'my' land, you could say that at least I am on home ground and have more chance of defending myself against aggression. What kind of handling do you think is needed? Are you asking about people who just walk up and sit down? Or are you talking about people who walk up and throw a petrol bomb?

Intentions and actions need be met with appropriate responses regardless of whether I am on land that I claim to own or not. To fully answer your question, though, requires a very detailed and lengthy explanation of the way that attraction works in life - which is something that I have only really understood in the last 10-15 years. Previous to that, I would have thought quite similarly to you - but since understanding points of attraction I now know how to be free, without control. It's not something I can easily demonstrate at the drop of a hat, we need to live the right experiences to know the details.

I recommend these books to everyone: http://www.rightuseofwill.com/books

·
·
·
·

People, like 90% of them, do not believe in the law of attraction, and thus are not even ready to accept the information about the information that would allow them to create their life in a way that didn't require hard borders.

So, right now, we have to talk about hard borders and how to handle them.

·
·
·
·
·

Part of the issue is that there is a lot of incorrect information about attraction - which I typically hear when people talk about 'law of attraction'.. So it is not surprising that many people are not interested by it as they see it doesn't work in the ways described. The more we collectively heal our hearts and come to accept each other's difference more - the more those who successfully understand attraction will be able to demonstrate it with others in a way that will be accepted.

I don't really see the need for a 'fencing off' of the topics - there is nothing wrong with including understandings of attraction in discussions about boundaries and, in truth, for me - I don't see any other way of having a useful discussion on the topic... Doing so is like having a conversation about apple pie without talking about apples.

·
·
·
·
·
·

And talking about something that 90% of the people aren't even ready, to be ready to implement is talking about pie in the sky.

So, why do we not discuss living in our own universes? Where we do not have to interact with others at all, unless we want to? Where there is a border no one can cross?

This is an even higher truth than the law of attraction. So, do you wish do discuss that level? I do not, because what we need are workable solutions for 90% of the people today.

·
·
·
·
·
·
·

Attraction is a function of the magnetic repulsion/drawing that is inherent to our own magnetic will essence. Our feelings of attraction and repulsion are our will expressing to us internally. This is not really difficult to understand, it is just that for aeons people have denied this and also decided what was right for others to know or not know - hence we have the idea that 'people are not ready'. The main reason people appear to be unready is due to their denial and there is no way to change the situation without them understanding they need to change it.

Attraction occurs 100% of the time regardless - so there is really no need to wait to explore it - consciousness can only increase as a result in my understanding.

We really do already exist in our own universes, in a sense - there is only one being in existence - interacting with itself.. The reflective nature means that a universe is, in a sense, the inverse of you. The more we fragment and compartmentalise internally, the more we will want to repeat that externally (usually) - so by positively integrating parts of self internally, we are changed such that we feel less fear and have more acceptance for the outer reality too (and thus no perception of a need to be walled off).

Your own will can open space for you to live in complete seclusion if you prefer - but typically our karma will draw us back to others unless we are fully balanced already.

I don't really categorise understandings in terms of 'secret high' and 'common low'. Some people will listen and some will not, according to their level of consciousness and intentions.

@ura-soul we should aware for our and nations health what you think?

·

Can you write that using different words? I am not clear what you are asking here.