Value of Ethereum

지난달

ethereum coin.jpg

ETH is an extremely underestimated network. Just this morning I was reading this article about Ethereum being a scam because of its scalability issues. Of course Cryptokitties was brought up and the fear that ETH will not be able to support mainstream applications.


It's weird to think that the number two coin on the market cap is being permanently bashed, but at the same time it makes a lot of sense.


There are over a dozen networks out there that claim to be Ethereum Killers, yet there is no such thing. Meanwhile, the same fears do not apply to bitcoin. Bitcoin maximalism is very strong and the idea that another project could overtake Bitcoin within the next 5 years is laughable to many.

etherum-icon.jpg

What we have to remember is that every network has its niche. Adding smart contracts to ETH makes it much more vulnerable than Bitcoin, but also provides way more functionality.

What kind of functionality?

In my opinion Maker is the best ERC-20 token currently on the ETH network. It allows anyone with ETH to use their stake as collateral. You can create Dai out of 'thin air' and give yourself a permissionless loan. This is actually quite amazing and, at the same time, completely disregarded as a sub-accomplishment. The ability for ETH to have it's own stable-coin backed by itself is something that will have tremendous network effect going forward.

evolution_of_the_internet_from_decentralized_to_centralized.jpg

DEX vs Regulation

There are already a handful of dexchanges that operate directly on the Ethereum network. Sure, you can only trade ERC-20 tokens on them if you want to trade directly on chain, but at the same time there will be a lot of ways around this (such as an ERC-20 token pegged to another asset). That's why Maker is so important. It is literally designed to peg tokens to other assets.

Even if Maker was the only ERC-20 token this would still be a very interesting development. The ability to turn unstable ETH into stable DAI permissionlessly will become more and more valuable as mainstream adoption kicks in. The more adoption in the market, the more centralized authorities will try to crack down on KYC/AML in an attempt to control everything for profit. The ability to hedge our investments directly on chain cannot be overstated.

decentralized-centralized-distrubuted.jpeg

Defi Niche

The purpose of Ethereum is not to run a fully functional decentralized gaming industry or anything else that requires mass transactions to happen very quickly. Ethereum is much more boring than that. The purpose of Ethereum is decentralized finance. It's boring, but it can make us rich, making it not so boring for a lot of us.

Like Bitcoin, the purpose of Ethereum isn't to be on the bleeding edge of technology. It is already starting to settle down and become more stable and consistent. It is these kinds of attributes that bring about mainstream adoption: when the establishment feels safe dipping their toes into the water.

We use Ethereum for buying a house, not for micro transactions.

The same can be said for Bitcoin. These big market cap projects are going to start attracting big money. It's only going to make sense for the applications resting on top of these networks to fit the network itself. Naturally, this implies big transactions that don't need to happen very often, but require a higher degree of trust.

network decentralized trust reputation.jpg

Network Effect

In my opinion, ETH has one of the best networks out there. There are so many developers trying their hearts out to get their projects off the ground. Ethereum isn't going anywhere. In fact, it's expanding. There will be millions of developers working atop the network because the network itself is a neutral economic ground that hasn't yet been tainted by the establishment and their debt/wage/tax slavery.

We really don't see this level of network effect with any other project, including Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the original peer-to-peer money-only transfer. Ethereum is the original peer-to-peer smart-contract platform. Time in the market really means something at this point. It might not in 20 years but it sure as hell does now. It would take years for another project to overtake these ones, and that's assuming optimal conditions.

No competition

Luckily, none of the other projects are actually trying to compete with each other. There is so much work to do that everyone can just branch out and complete their own niche and build their own network. The amount of expansion we have left to accomplish far outweighs the incentive for these communities to compete. Naturally, that's just the name of the game when it comes to decentralization.

Conclusion

Don't trust the maximalist naysayers. Ethereum is going to become a very impressive self-contained network will a lot of Defi capabilities. The network is expanding at an exponential rate because the incentive to develop there is greatly increased by the prospect of creating valuable smart-contracts and ERC-20 tokens. Like Bitcoin, Ethereum is already too big to fail and contains a healthy backbone of diehard supporters. I look forward to seeing what they come out with next.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

Well put!

great post bud and this is one thing we dont actually agree on but i totally understand your point and would buy ethereum before bitcoin lol
i think in ten years from now ethereum and bitcoin might be not even in the top 100
but ethereum is a great platform and opened up for others to make their projects bigger than ethereum faster and more secure and fungible but as right now ethereum is definitely the leader
hope all is well and have a great day edicted
cheers

·

Ten years is not a long time. Nothing can touch Bitcoin until mainstream adoption hits. Bitcoin is going to absorb the legacy system after it fails. No other network is going to be able to keep up with that kind of value transfer; not even close. Only after that happens do the other projects have a chance of building their own value to significant levels.

I certainly welcome a superior project to come onto the scene and blow everyone away. It would be a boon to the entire world. I just don't expect that's how it will go down in the least bit.

·
·

well said bud
and i agree they will have to get everyone in bitcoin before people wake up sort of how when the people wake up the ones like us will not be anywhere near bitcoin by the time that happens but we will see
i am sticking with monero for my only coin that is used like a currency besides llitecoin which i dont have much of
cheers budd

Maybe we can replace SBD with dai like token here on steem....

·

I've made this suggestion many times.
https://steemit.com/curation/@edicted/curation-and-sbd-are-broken

It's really just a matter of waiting for Steemit Inc to get around to it.
If not, then a centralized option will be created that turns decentralized later.
This is exactly what's happening with SMTs and SteemEngine right now.

Ethereum lost is first to market competitive advantage. They have a great community, but until they address their scalability issues, they are dead to me.

·

When Ethereum starts providing functionality that you actually want to use... you'll be back. Personally I've really enjoyed playing around with Maker and giving myself Dai loans.

Nice article and very good points for the eth bashers to think about. Although steem-engine has a long way to go before it could even be called decentralized let alone distributed, the potential for true smart-contract capability to come to steem via sidechain is really exciting to me (and MUCH more so than SMTs on the mainchain). But as you say, eth has already had smart contract capability for a long time and has a huge number of devs working on the platform.

·

I purposely did not bring up Steem here because I always do that and we are so far removed from this topic. Steem is a project that games could run off of and things like that. The price we pay for our functionality comes from less decentralization.

Again, all networks have their own niche. You wouldn't buy a house on the Steem blockchain but you would play the lottery or do p2p gambling. 3 second blocks are nice for these kinds of dapps.

·
·

What, you don't think Dan's evil plan for crypto world domination is about to come to fruition?!? Heresy! :)
I was actually thinking precisely about games when I mentioned I was excited about possibility of (more than the current very limited set of) smart contracts coming to steem-engine. Would be really cool to be able to issue non-fungible tokens both for games and also even for creative types to be able to do limited edition / unique artworks and what not. I think it would dovetail nicely with the niche that Steem has carved out for itself. ETH gives a good example of how much value smart contracts can bring, to the point that even if the ETH network itself is kinda crappy in terms of scalability and block time, it is still the #2 crypto with a bullet and isn't going anywhere

·
·
·

It's so true... if any valid decentralized game comes to the market it will moon so fast. The problem is decentralized organization is so difficult. How do you pay random developers for their work? How do you even gauge how much work they did?

We need serious logistics added to these governance structures before they start to make sense.


This post was shared in the Curation Collective Discord community for curators, and upvoted and resteemed by the @c-squared community account after manual review.
@c-squared runs a community witness. Please consider using one of your witness votes on us here

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.