Social Engineering and Influence Through Emotional Appeals

2년 전

Psychology and persuasion is a hot field of study, especially in modern times with ads to influence and promote people to buy things, but also in the recent past with Edward Bernays and Joseph Goebbels to use propaganda to manipulate the minds of the masses. Social engineering is as important now if not more than it was then. Making a persuasive message is big part of business and social dynamics.


Source

We're always being influenced, and we do some influencing as well. Changing people's mind is hard to do. Psychology is very complex, and persuasion can be looked at as an art of sorts. Ineffective methods to change someone's mind can backfire. When we intend to persuade others it can be seen in how we communicate.

By default, we're prone to using our intuitive emotional language to get an 'in' to someone's psyche and enhance our powers of persuasion. Advertisers, marketers, politicians and religious leaders effectively make use of this emotional mind control to convince people to accept or do something. Emotional appeals are used by everyone though in order to try to win people over. But sometimes those appeals are flawed are the desired goal backfires.

Does our desire to get someone to accept something we want them to accept have us use more emotional appeal or become more emotional with our words? It seems so, as researchers have demonstrated in a study published earlier this year in Psychological Science.

People be positive or negative in trying to persuade others, but they also move to more emotional appeals even when someone or a group isn't receptive to the language. Many persist in their emotional language, and it backfires on them. Positive words like excellent or outstanding can make people feel good, and some words are more emotional to convey emotions, like exciting and thrilling.

Sometimes keeping emotions out of it might work better, as researcher Matthew D. Rocklage of The Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University says:

It's possible that to be seen as rational and reasonable, people might remove emotion from their language when attempting to persuade.

But that isn't what most people do, since we're more prone to be affected and influenced with emotional language. We recognize the pull of emotional language ourselves in the social sphere, and use it ourselves to try to get what we want.

Participants in an online study were shown a photo and some details about a product on Amazon. Some were asked to write a 5 star review to persuade others to buy the product, while others were asked to write a 5 star review describing the positive features. Researchers used the Evaluative Lexicon to measure the use of emotional language in those reviews.

Both groups made positive reviews, but those who tried to persuade others to buy a product used more emotional language, compared to those who only wrote about the positives without intending to get others to buy it. The intention to persuade automatically brought out more emotional language. Researchers say it was deliberate.

Now, when someone or a group of people are more rational, one might expect a similar approach to be taken. But we're still prone to use more emotional language to persuade rational thinkers, and this most often backfires:

Past research indicates that emotional appeals can backfire when an audience prefers unemotional appeals. Our findings indicate that there is a strong enough connection between persuasion and emotion in people's minds that they continue to use emotion even in the face of an audience where that approach can backfire.

The link between motion and persuasion is detectable and gets ingrained in our memory. Emotional language is readily associated with persuasion. Those who are more rational in thinking might recognize this connection and be less likely to accept a message once they see it. Using more emotional language might come off as an attempt to manipulate them, rather than simply stating things in a factual manner. For most people though, I think the emotional language works and the thought of being manipulated goes over their head.

Are you more or less influenced when emotional language is used? I tend to be less affected. I can care and recognize something as wrong because of its affect. But I also discern how people can be negatively affected without anything wrong being done to them. When people are too attached to something, they might not like hearing the truth of a matter, and they might try to make it seem like you wronged them, when all you did was tell them something they didn't want to hear.

Making people feel-good through emotional language is a way to get them to accept something, even if they wouldn't normally accept it. Emotions are powerful, and we're being manipulated in society because we want to feel-good. We don't want to hear about negatives that make us look bad, negatives or wrongs we are individually or collectively partaking in. We're being played like puppets on many levels without realizing it.


References:


Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.


If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
Follow me for more content to come!


My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending
  ·  2년 전

I'm definitely less motivated by emotional language and pharma ads make my eyes roll back in my head. I also see a lot of attempts to make the elderly identify not only with various diseases, but with all these drugs they're pushing, like the latest tag line: "What's your Tresiba reason?" gag

·

Tresiba ready! LOL I don't even know what it's for and that name is familiar. They need to do something to distract you from the list of horrible side effects.

·

LOL, yeah, they speak in soft tones and make anything sound so great :/

I am much more rationally motivated than when I was younger. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say I am less emotionally motivated now. Charlatans tugging at heart strings has hardened my heart to some degree.
"Emotional Intelligence" by Daniel Goleman was a paradigm shifting book for me. It's sad that emotional intelligence is given so little emphasis, but is essential to rational thought and action.
Reason and emotion, both are necessary, but neither is sufficient.

·

Hehe, indeed, being less emotionally drive means the other polarity is more present ;) Being fooled tends to make us want to know how not to be fooled indeed ;)

Are you more or less influenced when emotional language is used?

it actually depends on the message been conveyed. To an extent i can sense when someone is trying to be manipulative with their, esp when what they are saying is not relatable with little or no facts

·

Yeah, it does depend. Sometimes emotional communication is useful and necessary.

Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

You are right in this society is very common to be manipulated by the media also should be noted that when we identify with something we tend to expect that they understand our tastes besides the fact that there are days when our emotions are not in tune with our way of being common and we are susceptible to confronting problems of form in which we would not do commonly to those tricks of Jedi hahaha

·

I have a hard time understanding what you mean...

"Won't someone think of the children!?" Nice article.

This influence is sometimes people mind positive and sometimes negative.

·

Is it nice? Really?