Minecolonies & The better Builder!

5개월 전


Hi everyone, one of the things I noticed when we had our Patreon competition was that one of the biggest bottlenecks was the speed of the builder. This was due to a number of reasons but mainly due to the numerous trips he has to make and how much he has to walk around in the building he is building.

For that reason, I changed a bunch of things around this to improve it.

I started by making sure that the builder would not take items with him he doesn't need in his current building phase.

Since he has two primarily important phases where he has to take items with him I separated into decorative and normal blocks.

Where I would check for a number of conditions to determine if a block is decoration or not.

And then, in the pickup code, I would check if the stage is not equal to the decoration stage and would then add the "is not a decoration" predicate to the pickup code.

Besides that, if his inventory is full but he wants to pick up more items I had him previously have a 50% chance to dump an item after a certain slot.

I now adjusted this to make it less likely to dump big stacks.

One of the main things I changed was allowing people to assign certain builders directly to a build request.

This is very useful since this way you can tell the closest builder to take care of a building which reduces the time to build essentially.

For that, I'd add in the window class (the code side of the client GUIs) for once a method which would get all builders from the colony and make sure it's the right builders as well.

     * Update the builder's list but try to keep the same one.
    private void updateBuilders()
        builders.add(new Tuple<>(LanguageHandler.format("com.minecolonies.coremod.job.Builder") + ":", BlockPos.ORIGIN));
                          .filter(build -> build instanceof AbstractBuildingBuilderView && !((AbstractBuildingBuilderView) build).getWorkerName().isEmpty() && !(build instanceof BuildingMiner.View))
                          .map(build -> new Tuple<>(((AbstractBuildingBuilderView) build).getWorkerName(), build.getLocation()))

And then make sure they get displayed nicely in the dropdown list.

One of the requirements to make this work was to change the claiming code from claimed by a citizen to claimed by building and just having the main citizen displayed in the GUI.

Then, I would, on work order creation add the position of the builder as a possible parameter.
So, I'd first check if the distance is too far from any builder to be built (more than 100 blocks on default if the builder is not specifically assigned.)

Then, if there would be a directly assigned builder and he can build this building (in terms of level requirements).
He would accept it and claim it.

Important here was also, to make sure that if a builder has a request manually assigned to him, he would do those with a higher priority as well. Meaning, that when he checks for open work orders he would check first if there are any assigned to him.

final WorkOrderBuildDecoration order = list.stream().filter(w -> w.getClaimedBy() != null && w.getClaimedBy().equals(getLocation())).findFirst().orElse(null);
        if (order != null)

The next thing I changed was adding a progress counter in the GUI.

For that, I would take the total quantity of blocks which has to be placed and compare it with the number of blocks which had been placed already and send the result to the client.

That would then be displayed and requested from the view of the builder.

To make sure we know the total number this would be stored in the work order the first time the builder scans for the required resources.
For backward compatibility, we would always calculate this if it is at 0 at the moment and we're recalculating it anyway.

I hope you liked this update, I certainly did because of the slow speed and repetitive running there and back from a faraway hut was starting to drive me crazy!
See you in the next update =)

Pull Requests:


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  trending
  • Great article, don't forget the eye candy of images of the game.
  • Keep the updates coming, very impressive.

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.

Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.


I got material for another 4 posts lined up =D


Thank you for your review, @helo! Keep up the good work!

Hey, @raycoms!

Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!

Get higher incentives and support Utopian.io!
Simply set @utopian.pay as a 5% (or higher) payout beneficiary on your contribution post (via SteemPlus or Steeditor).

Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.

Vote for Utopian Witness!

Hi @raycoms!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your post is eligible for our upvote, thanks to our collaboration with @utopian-io!
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Hi, @raycoms!

You just got a 8.96% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.

Congratulations @raycoms!
Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade in the following category:

  • Pending payout - Ranked 9 with $ 85,42

Nead help bro