Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
STEEMKR.COM IS SPONSORED BY
ADVERTISEMENT
Sort Order:  trending

This is outrageous - but it will only give him more power, and contribute to the demise of these corporate morons. Just waiting for my Steem to rise in value after the migration to Dtube, Bitchute, and other Alt-tech sites.

Come to @Dlive and be done with these silly centralized authoritarian butt holes.

·

Dlive, bitchute, real.video, and GAB has a video platform too. The more the merrier. Not keeping eggs in one basket.

·
·

All of them!

  ·  2년 전

well maybe he migrates to Bitchute and Dtube and bring his 1,5 or so million viewers with him :)

·

He is already on Real.video as well. Though he should really get onto ANY platform he can. The more the merrier.

He literally sends his cult to attack Sandy Hook victims, there's an example of your hate speech. Reminder that direct threats of violence and libel are against the first amendment so you can't even make that argument with AJ. Pretending like his behavior isn't outrageous and reprehensible makes you look like a hack without nuance.

That being said, I do think these social media sites should be public utilities as well. It makes sense in the modern era.

·

Do you literally have a link to him doing that? Since he does 4 hours a day of live broadcasting.

·
·
·
·
·

I'm aware of the crazy people. Where did he "literally send his cult"? When is Maxine Waters getting banned for "literally sending" her cult followers to harass Republicans? "Literally" has a meaning.

·
·
·

Have you seen him say that, or have you just seen MANY news sites saying he said that. I challenge you to find him saying what they are claiming. I honestly don't think you can.

You need to WAKE UP in one regard. If someone makes a claim/allegation against ANYONE you should expect to see EVIDENCE instead of being stupid and just taking it as true because they said it was. Do some research. Think for yourself instead of allowing yourself to be weaponized by liars.

Alex Jones has said a lot of things I didn't like. Yet the claims about Sandy Hook don't happen to be one of them. That's why when he is in court over this and they watch the actual videos where he doesn't say this his accusers lose the case.

We need to go back to being a country where people are INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Right now we are GUILTY until PROVEN innocent and if you happen to be viewed as an enemy like Alex Jones you can be PROVEN innocent and the media will keep speaking the lies as though that proof does not exist.

For some time it has been the Sandy Hook thing.

They also accuse him of saying there were Children as Slaves on Mars when I happened to see that show and it was guest Robert David Steele who said that at the very end and Alex did not go along with it. It was almost like Steele said that out of the blue at the end just to give the media something to attribute to Alex.

Now the recent talk about him attacking and pushing down a child. The guy in the video is not Alex Jones, not even remotely close. Alex talked about that video, but he is not the one in the video or affiliated with it. It just happened to be a viral video he commented on.

So unless you can find UNEDITED footage of him actually saying things about Sandy Hook then why continue repeating untruths?

·
·
·
·

Yeah, I've seen him call sandy hook a hoax. It's insane. Stop defending a madman, please, and thank you.

·
·
·
·
·

Prove it. Show the video. Until you can show it you're condemning a person without evidence. Especially depending upon where you saw it at. Was it unedited video? He's talked about it a lot so yeah with proper editing he can be made to say anything.

At the moment if you think it is okay to treat someone as guilty based upon allegations then it is YOU who are mad.

You do realize this has gone to court, and the videos that were brought there did not show this? This is fact.

How much you dislike a person doesn't suddenly make "guilty until proven innocent", "or guilty with no care for proof" a non-evil and mad thing.

Look in a mirror and wake the fuck up.

EDIT: I'll continue to be honest with you. If you can show the evidence and it hasn't been sliced and diced in some media center editing factory that shows what they are saying I'll agree with you. In fact A LOT of people will agree with you. The problem is they say it is SO, and they don't show the evidence.

As to the MADMAN comment.

I believe in "Innocent until PROVEN guilty". I will follow that even for people that I dislike a great deal. It is not okay to apply the LAW and JUSTICE for some people, and then think we don't need to follow it for others.

Mad or not.

The opinion of X amount of people even if X is a lot of people does not make evil behavior suddenly good.

Defaming people without proof and continuing to spread that defamation without showing the footage to back it up is evil.

If he said it, isn't it strange that none of these news outlets play it while they are making the claims. They don't seem to have to problem playing other videos.... HMMMM Why is that?

·
·
·
·
·
·

There's plenty of "sliced and diced" clips of him saying that sandy hook was an "inside job" and that the parents are "crisis actors". I can spend a few hours going through his stuff, but I have seen enough of his garbage to know what he said and how he said it. I don't believe things unless I see them, and claiming I do is rather silly.

Adding a qualifier of not allowing edits to be shown as proof is rather silly. I can link you plenty of montages of him saying heinous stuff, but if that's not good then I have to concede to your ridiculous criteria because I don't feel like wasting my time.

·
·
·
·
·
·
·

I can edit your text above to make you say things you didn't say. When you have someone that speaks as much as he does it is easy to edit and make him say pretty much anything. So if all you can find is edits then you are the one with ridiculous criteria and are allowing yourself to be a puppet.

All I ask and anyone asks is you provide proof. You can't do it. You base things on your emotions and opinion.

Like I said he actually went to court for this and when the videos that the people filed the cases against him were shown in court he didn't say what they claim he said.

Edits are not allowed in court. If you can't get the basic concept of why people wouldn't want to see edits then you are being a fool. The good news is you don't have to continue to be that way. Which is the only reason I talk to you. ;)

Here is why I have that criteria.

He could say "They are saying I said Sandy Hook didn't happen". All they have to do is edit that it easily can become "Sandy Hook didn't happen" simply by chopping off the beginning. It won't sound edited at all as it will just have deleted important parts that completely redefine what he was talking about.

This is what we mean by no edits. I am not saying give me a mish mash of spliced together stuff. I'm saying wherever you can find he said it I'd like to see what he said completely.

I've caught the media editing the things a lot of people said by intentionally cutting off important things they said to totally change the context.

I am interested in seeing Alex Jones saying it. I haven't seen signs of it.

Also I ask again. If he said it, then why are the places repeating he said it not showing the proof every time they bring it up? That's what they tend to do most of the time. It is a very big red flag on the honesty of the story when it is repeated so many times without actually showing him saying it. Think about it.
I kept hearing a name recently "Wolfgang Halbig" though I haven't read or watched anything he has done. He is the guy that apparently is really pushing the Sandy Hook being a hoax thing.

Perhaps he was a guest at some point on Alex Jones in which case IF he ever said it that seems like a possible place to look.

Here is his facebook page I found searching duckduckgo. I don't use facebook.
And a Shame On You Facebook page countering him.
SANDY HOOK: Wolfgang Halbig Prevails in Lawsuit Filed by Alias “Leonard Pozner”
Fact-Checking More Of Wolfgang Halbig’s Absolute Nonsense

There is a ton more. Yet when it comes to Sandy Hook that is the name I keep reading or hearing people mention when inferring it is a hoax. Let's do a quick search and see if I can find a time he may have been on Alex Jones show as that may have what I'm asking you to find if it exists. I want to see for myself.

The question is how easy will it be to find if youtube and other places deleted all of the videos. That's the thing about censorship. Makes it really hard to find any kind of proof doesn't it?

Wolfgang Halbig: "I've lost total respect for Alex Jones" "Which side is infowars on?" - 2015

If he had Halbig on I have no doubts Halbig said what they claim Alex Jones said, but like I said I happened to be watching the show where Robert David Steele brought up children slaves on Mars out of nowhere at the end of an interview and Alex said he doesn't know anything about that. It seemed like a very odd thing to insert compared to what Steele had been saying up to that point. Sure enough the media comes out almost immediately claiming Alex Jones said their were Child Slaves on Mars. Nope, he didn't. His guest did. Alex didn't agree with it.

So if he had Halbig on his show I have zero doubts Halbig said this as it is all over the place. That doesn't mean Alex did.

·
·
·
·
·
·
·

Also. Even if he did say it. He has the right to say it if we have free speech.

Free speech does not mean NO consequences. In history people have often been shunned or ostracized for saying unpopular (even untrue) things.

If it is defamation and truly harmful then the court system is there for that.

Censorship is a slippery slope and a very bad thing.

I dislike a lot of things people say, yet I'll fight to defend their right to say it.

As to Sandy Hook. My current opinion is that it happened. I don't put the same importance on whether it did or did not as some people. All I really care about is evidence/proof if people or persons are accused regardless of how vile they may be.

·
·
·
·
·

Calling something a hoax isn't 'sending his cult to attack Sandy Hook victims...'

You're making shit up. You know it. That makes you a liar.

I know it, and so does everyone that ever sees this exchange, which you can never deny occurred, since it's on the blockchain.

I have misstated things before here. What I do when I discover I'm wrong is admit it, and change my mind.

Then, I'm right.

You could do that too.

We'll see what you do.

·
·
·
·
·
·

Lol, you have no idea how social power works.
when you repeatedly scream and yell things for years, while having brainwashed cultists follow you listen to every word, they WILL do crazy shit. That's how cults work. You can't just say "yeah i mean i said we should murder people over and over for years and then someone actually did it but its not my fault bro!" (re: vegas). Life doesn't work that way.

Take a sociology class sometime, you are stunningly uneducated in the field.

·
·
·
·
·
·
·

You mean like the media repeatedly yelling about Alex Jones and not providing the proof. Or the same media using greenscreens to hoax them being in say Afghanistan during the attack, or interviewing two people one in New York and one in the UK but in reality both interviewees were just standing at different points in a parking lot in New York. Or making a protest seem huge that had maybe a dozen people walking around in a small taped off section that passersby caught on their phone showing the scam?

So if they repeat the thing over and over again and YOU are buying into it does that mean you are the cult?

·
·
·
·
·
·
·

Spoken like a true cultist. You completely ignored the points I made. This is because you cannot address them and pretend to be reasonable.

Name one person AJ said we should murder.

You keep making shit up, and it keeps being not true. If you could let that sink in for just a moment, you might realize it has relevance to the social group you are defending for those little hits of dopamine you get each time you do.

That might enable you to just walk away. It doesn't matter to where you go, as anywhere would be better able to avail you of reason. No one will benefit more from you being reasonable than you.

great rant

@caitlinjohnstone posted that Congress told these weasels to censor 'information rebels'.

Calling for government to protect free speech in this case is like calling for foxes to protect chickens.

You're on Steemit. You know the solution isn't government, it's us.

the thing about hateful speech is that it is open to interpretation. I am working on a video on this same topic, It is strange I made a censorship topic video yesterday and posted it last night before I heard about this. It is disgusting.